From: John B. on
On Apr 16, 12:58 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 11:23 am, "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said:
>
> > > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > > state.edu> wrote:
> > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
>
> > >>  "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS.  They don't show them there.  Doesn't
> > >>> fit their narrative.
>
> > >>> Randy
>
> > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally
> > >> illiterate, too.
>
> > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216...
> > >> mage_id=1- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
> > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
> > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners
> > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of
> > > violence.
>
> > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the
> > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using
> > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
> > > concept of nuance.
>
> > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk didn't
> > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man into
> > the White House.  Is that whatyouwould have us believe?
>
> What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is
> accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration
> a "racist". If you recall, all of the stink raised by the
> congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of
> protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations
> (spitting).

And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs
> are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and
> misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were.


Either prove this assertion or stop making it.

From: The Bogeyman on
On Apr 16, 1:07 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 12:58 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 16, 11:23 am, "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said:
>
> > > > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > > > state.edu> wrote:
> > > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
>
> > > >>  "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
> > > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS.  They don't show them there.  Doesn't
> > > >>> fit their narrative.
>
> > > >>> Randy
>
> > > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally
> > > >> illiterate, too.
>
> > > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216...
> > > >> mage_id=1- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
> > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
> > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners
> > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of
> > > > violence.
>
> > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the
> > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using
> > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
> > > > concept of nuance.
>
> > > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk didn't
> > > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man into
> > > the White House.  Is that whatyouwould have us believe?
>
> > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is
> > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration
> > a "racist". Ifyourecall, all of the stink raised by the
> > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of
> > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations
> > (spitting).
>
> And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs
>
> > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and
> > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were.
>
> Either prove this assertion or stop making it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Is photographic evidence enough for you, or were these photoshopped?

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they-failed/

This time they were busted only because the tea partiers were tipped
off beforehand. Who knows how long it had been going on before they
were exposed by the cable news outlets.

I could swear someone already posted this link. Are you in denial?
From: BAR on
In article <a158e229-7b36-4cab-9adf-e40360d9d5a8
@k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> >
> > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is
> > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration
> > a "racist". If you recall, all of the stink raised by the
> > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of
> > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations
> > (spitting).
>
> And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs
> > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and
> > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were.
>
>
> Either prove this assertion or stop making it.

You would dismiss the proof so why bother.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on
On Apr 16, 1:07 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 12:58 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 16, 11:23 am, "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said:
>
> > > > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > > > state.edu> wrote:
> > > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
>
> > > >>  "R&B" <none_of_your_busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>
> > > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS.  They don't show them there.  Doesn't
> > > >>> fit their narrative.
>
> > > >>> Randy
>
> > > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally
> > > >> illiterate, too.
>
> > > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image_popup.php?image=29216...
> > > >> mage_id=1- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
> > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
> > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners
> > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat of
> > > > violence.
>
> > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the
> > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using
> > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
> > > > concept of nuance.
>
> > > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk didn't
> > > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man into
> > > the White House.  Is that whatyouwould have us believe?
>
> > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is
> > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration
> > a "racist". If you recall, all of the stink raised by the
> > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of
> > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations
> > (spitting).
>
> And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs
>
> > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and
> > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were.
>
> Either prove this assertion or stop making it.

Same proof as for the N comments and the spitting when dem
congresspeople baited the tea party protesters at the health care
vote.The fact that the dem baiting didn't provoke anything is
interesting enough, but the fact that lefties go to tea party rallies
and try to discredit the legit protesters there show the respect they
have for legit protest...only legit when done by the left!

In any event, you prove the N word and spitting allegations and I'll
prove the dem organizers involvement in the dirty politics against the
tea party people. As usual, blog posts and hearsay don't count.
From: William Clark on
In article
<49c913b7-0a2e-4f48-8dee-1caae7f762c3(a)i37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
Dinosaur_Sr <frostback(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> wrote:

> On Apr 16, 1:07�pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 12:58�pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 16, 11:23�am, "R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said:
> >
> > > > > On Apr 13, 8:17�am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > > > > state.edu> wrote:
> > > > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
> >
> > > > >> �"R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. �They don't show them there.
> > > > >>> �Doesn't
> > > > >>> fit their narrative.
> >
> > > > >>> Randy
> >
> > > > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally
> > > > >> illiterate, too.
> >
> > > > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image
> > > > >>popup.php?image=29216...
> > > > >> mage id=1- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
> > > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
> > > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners
> > > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat
> > > > > of
> > > > > violence.
> >
> > > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the
> > > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using
> > > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
> > > > > concept of nuance.
> >
> > > > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk didn't
> > > > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man into
> > > > the White House. �Is that whatyouwould have us believe?
> >
> > > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is
> > > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration
> > > a "racist". If you recall, all of the stink raised by the
> > > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of
> > > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations
> > > (spitting).
> >
> > And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs
> >
> > > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and
> > > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were.
> >
> > Either prove this assertion or stop making it.
>
> Same proof as for the N comments and the spitting when dem
> congresspeople baited the tea party protesters at the health care
> vote.The fact that the dem baiting didn't provoke anything is
> interesting enough, but the fact that lefties go to tea party rallies
> and try to discredit the legit protesters there show the respect they
> have for legit protest...only legit when done by the left!

I.e., there is none. Thank you. You have nothing.
>
> In any event, you prove the N word and spitting allegations and I'll
> prove the dem organizers involvement in the dirty politics against the
> tea party people. As usual, blog posts and hearsay don't count.

The "N" word posters are in the URLs.