From: Howard Brazee on
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:56:28 GMT, assimilate(a)borg.org wrote:

>> We've all heard of Theodore's Big Stick Diplomacy starting with "Talk
>> Softly and Carry a Big Stick".
>>
>> Talk and action are not the same thing.
>
>Yes and Obama seems to be all talk. Bush tended more towards Teddy's policy.


It seems that they are both carrying the same stick. Obama might be
trying harder to make friends with allies in the same war.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:53:19 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>> His bosses are the same as Bush's bosses. Follow the money.
>
>If things had turned around after the $787 billion stimulus would Bush
>have been given any credit for TARP?

By his supporters, yes. And Obama's supporters will give credit to
him.

We'll never know whether the bailout was a good solution as we can't
compare it with alternatives.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:54:31 GMT, assimilate(a)borg.org wrote:

>> His bosses are the same as Bush's bosses. Follow the money.
>
>No Howard, Obama's bosses are the unions. Bush, not so much

Follow the money.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: assimilate on

On 22-Nov-2009, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> Neither is rocket science, once you know how it works. Bert was trying
> to argue that the country is in worse shape than it would have been if
> Bush and Obama had not bailed out the banking industry.

I'm sure something did some good. I imagine the saving of AIG was probably
necessary. However the morass of pork and handouts to Democratic interests
that was the stimulus and the unaccountability with which TARP funds have
allocated have both made a mockery of reprentative government. The Treasury
Dept should not replace the Congress as an appropriations body. And why was
Lehhman Bros, Goldman's main rival, allowed to fail? Could the army of
former Goldman employees in DC had any influence on that?

--
bill-o
From: assimilate on

On 22-Nov-2009, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote:

> >No Howard, Obama's bosses are the unions. Bush, not so much
>
> Follow the money.

Do you think I just pulled that comment out of thin air? Everyone in the
Auto debacle took a haircut except who? Who was the #1 visitor to the White
House post-inauguration?

--
bill-o
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Prev: Palin's book on top at amazon
Next: Was Pitts right?