The BP debacle (was: Need a job??)
in [Golf]
|
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup
From: MNMikeW on 15 Jun 2010 18:30 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4c17fc16$0$4828$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:36:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:f8185e87-c716-4816-b9f6- >> e866d734a15d(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com... >>> On Jun 14, 5:53 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Sounds like an Obama screw up to me. >>> >>> If the earth were hit by a meteor, you'd call it an Obama screw-up, >>> such is the depth of your hatred. >> >> And the left would blame Bush for the meteor. Talk about depth of >> hatred. > > More bullshit. By that logic the left would be blaming Bush for BP's > oilspill. Are they? No. Don't get out much do you. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/pelosi-blames-bush-administration-for-bp-oil-spill-95175304.html http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/99727-dodd-blames-bush-for-oil-spill http://www.mediaite.com/tv/joe-klein-bp-oil-spill-is-actually-bushs-2nd-katrina/
From: Howard Brazee on 15 Jun 2010 19:22 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:20:58 -0400, William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: >You would only remove "most" of the oil with a massive supertanker >presence, taking oil and water back to onshore separators. Why didn't BP >come up with this idea from the word go, and get started on it? Answer: >their supertankers were too busy shipping oil around the world making >profits, to be taken out of service just to save the Gulf. They also seemed to be attracted to the idea of using chemicals to break the oil up into small pieces that weren't as visible. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on 15 Jun 2010 19:25 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:42:54 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>> Obama is careful not to appear angry - he knows what the reaction >>>>>> would be if he were an angry black man. >>>>>> >>>>>Riiiight. More leftwing conspiracy theories >>>> >>>> Conspiracy? What conspiracy theories do you see in my statement >>>> above? >>>> >>>All of it. >> >> Huh? The conspiracy theories are "All of it"? I've never heard of >> those conspiracy theories. Who was theorized to be conspiring? What >> was the supposed goal of the conspiracy? >> >So tell us Howard, what would the reaction be if Obama were to come across >as an "angry black man"? He'd lose votes. Nothing to do with any conspiracy. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: BAR on 15 Jun 2010 20:17 In article <4c17fc16$0$4828$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:36:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:f8185e87-c716-4816-b9f6- > > e866d734a15d(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com... > >> On Jun 14, 5:53 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Sounds like an Obama screw up to me. > >> > >> If the earth were hit by a meteor, you'd call it an Obama screw-up, > >> such is the depth of your hatred. > > > > And the left would blame Bush for the meteor. Talk about depth of > > hatred. > > More bullshit. By that logic the left would be blaming Bush for BP's > oilspill. Are they? No. Now why is that? Could it be because every sane > person on the planet knows it was caused by Beyond Petroleum putting > profits before safety? How does your foot taste? http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway- confidential/pelosi-blames-bush-administration-for-bp-oil-spill- 95175304.html http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/05/25/sen_chris_dodd_blames_ bush_for_oil_spill.html http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=161853 http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20005039-503544.html
From: bknight on 15 Jun 2010 20:25
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:14:16 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <0oef16t8d66fu44fnvc5dto6iip5ne35cn(a)4ax.com>, >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> >Kevin Costner came up with an idea. >> >http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/kevin-costner-bp-machine-developed-answer-oil-spill/story?id=10905441 >> >> His machine just may work, but one can hardly call Costner "regular >> people" since he put $20 million into development of his oil >> separator. > >Does Kevin Costner put his pants on differently than the rest of us? > Meaning what? That a he's a "regular person" like you? Try comparing yourself to his achievements in any way. LOL. As I have said over and over...you are a pitiful joke. You just can't help but prove it over and over. Keep it coming Bert, you're dedicated to making yourself foolish. BK |