Ken's not going to like this
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats
From: MNMikeW on 15 Jul 2010 17:22 "Howard Brazee" <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote in message news:dgsu36hmporjj81fqioiu3ios0u6qfldo2(a)4ax.com... > > So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without > collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. > Shirts with no collars. The horror.
From: R&B on 15 Jul 2010 18:41 On 2010-07-15 17:22:49 -0400, MNMikeW said: > "Howard Brazee" <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote in message > news:dgsu36hmporjj81fqioiu3ios0u6qfldo2(a)4ax.com... > >> >> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without >> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. >> > Shirts with no collars. The horror. Golfers who curse. The horror. Next thing you know, we'll hear that sailors curse, too. Randy
From: Lloyd Parsons on 15 Jul 2010 18:55 In article <2010071518413557586-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote: > On 2010-07-15 17:22:49 -0400, MNMikeW said: > > > "Howard Brazee" <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote in message > > news:dgsu36hmporjj81fqioiu3ios0u6qfldo2(a)4ax.com... > > > >> > >> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without > >> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. > >> > > Shirts with no collars. The horror. > > Golfers who curse. The horror. > > Next thing you know, we'll hear that sailors curse, too. > > Randy Hey, the Navy spent lots of good taxpayer dollars to teach me all those words... :) -- Lloyd
From: bknight on 15 Jul 2010 19:02 On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are >> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class". >> >> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without >> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. >> >> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all? > >To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast >and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now. First, you're seldom honest. Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to apply it to someone without knowing what it means. Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality from a depression guide site: "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others, but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile and angry". Now, tell us that Howard fits that. BK
From: BAR on 15 Jul 2010 19:07
In article <4i4v36d0svg62onklf4dfku6380og0hbbj(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > On 15 Jul 2010 22:40:31 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > > >> "Bad language" is a class issue. The same words said in Latin are > >> OK. But Anglo-Saxon versions of the word are "low class". > >> > >> So using crude language is sort of like wearing shirts without > >> collars. We don't want that on our golf courses. > >> > >> Or do you have a better reason? Or no reason at all? > > > >To be honest I find your passive aggressive postings to be dull as toast > >and was hoping to end the discussion. I will end it now. > > First, you're seldom honest. > > Next, Howard would be the last person to be classified as passive > aggressive. I think that you just have heard the term and wanted to > apply it to someone without knowing what it means. > > Here's a snapshot of the definition of passive aggressive personality > from a depression guide site: > > "Passive aggressive personality disorder is a chronic condition in > which a person seems to acquiesce to the desires and needs of others, > but actually passively resists them and becomes increasingly hostile > and angry". > > > Now, tell us that Howard fits that. > > BK Is everything a disorder with you? |