A speech without substance
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 14 Sep 2008 12:24 On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:56:14 -0400, BAR wrote: > Carbon wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:18:39 +0000, The Professor wrote: >>> Jack Hollis wrote: >>>> On 14 Sep 2008 14:44:59 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> This is all conjecture. I just would like to see Obama's SAT and >>>>>> LSAT scores. These tests are standardized and correlate highly >>>>>> with IQ tests. >>>>> >>>>> You are correct. As does academic achievement. >>>> >>>> Not really. Mensa has never used GPA or having a degree as >>>> qualification to join their society. They know that those measure >>>> are purely subjective. You could an MD and a dozen Ph D's and that >>>> wouldn't get you in. However, back in Obama's days in school, a high >>>> enough SAT or LSAT score would do the trick. In fact, you could be a >>>> high school drop out and get in if your LSAT score was high enough. >>>> >>>> Mensa does not accept SAT scores any more because of all the politics >>>> surrounding the test. >>> >>> Not that I care bout MENSA, but the SAT is not a meaningful test. The >>> ACT does better...at least it tests knowledge. I would like to see the >>> standardized test scores of people claiming to be intellectually >>> superior to others though. It's 100% telling when such people won't >>> give you their scores though. You know that if they were high they'd >>> be wearing them! >> >> Whatever. Of the three, who's scores are likely to be higher on *any* >> standardized test? > > Again, leadership is not something that is learned from books. So the ignorant like to say.
From: Carbon on 14 Sep 2008 12:25 On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:43:37 -0400, BAR wrote: > Carbon wrote: > >> Do you have any earthly idea how stupid this argument of yours is? > > The whole thing can be cleared up if Obama just publishes his Columbia > transcript. I didn't think so.
From: BAR on 14 Sep 2008 12:26 Carbon wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:42:41 -0400, William Clark wrote: >> In article <SoGdnZ1kWJWdxVHVnZ2dnUVZ_rLinZ2d(a)comcast.com>, >> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>> Alan Baker wrote: >>>> In article <SoGdnWRlWJV3yVHVnZ2dnUVZ_rLinZ2d(a)comcast.com>, >>>> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>> Carbon wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:54:41 -0400, BAR wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Where is his undergraduate transcript? >>>>>> Now you're being ridiculous. Palin took six years to finish a four >>>>>> year degree. McCain graduated 905 out of 909. I can guarantee you >>>>>> McCain's and Palin's handlers will be avoiding the subject of >>>>>> academic achievement at all costs. >>>>> McCain was 895 out or 899. >>>>> >>>>> Where was Obama ranked in his undergraduate class? >>>> I don't know. >>>> >>>> But we *do* know it was good enough to get him into Harvard Law, >>>> right? >>> No we don't. All we know is that Obama attended and graduated from >>> Harvard Law. We do not know how or why Obama was accepted to Harvard >>> Law. >>> >>>> Do you supposed McCain's results would have been good enough? >>>> >>> The Navy most likely sent him to Navy PG school. Like they send most >>> line officers with moderate intelligence. >> No they did not. And remember, he only made captain as a career naval >> officer. Hiis father and grandfather made admiral. >> >> Pretty sad, eh? > > He only made captain because his father and grandfather made admiral. > Otherwise he wouldn't even have made it that far. He only graduated because his grandfather was an Admiral.
From: William Clark on 14 Sep 2008 12:45 In article <48cd3636$0$5593$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:46:12 -0400, BAR wrote: > > William Clark wrote: > >> In article <SoGdnWZlWJV9yFHVnZ2dnUVZ_rLinZ2d(a)comcast.com>, > >> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >>> William Clark wrote: > >>> > >>>> Your getting a little out of your depth here. > >>> > >>> I can see spelling and grammar are not your strongest suit either. > >>> > >>> Where is Obama's undergraduate transcript from Columbia? > >> > >> Probably in his filing cabinet. Keep working on moving those goal > >> posts, It's getting more pathetic by the minute. > >> > >> By the way, what a bout the data on grade inflation? Pretty weak, huh? > > > > "what a bout" What does that mean? Can you translate that into English? > > Do you really want to get into a pissing match about spelling and > grammar? Think about it. Hey, anything to try to deflect this discussion he is losing so woefully off course. Anything.
From: William Clark on 14 Sep 2008 12:45
In article <G7KdnXG2M7wvrlDVnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d(a)comcast.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > annika1980 wrote: > > On Sep 14, 9:44 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > >> Do you know what percentage of Naval Officers of any class make Admiral? > > > > In McCain's family it's about 2-out-of-3. McCain was the dumb one. > > True, he couldn't keep an plane flying. I believe it was five planes, actually. |