Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
in [Golf]
|
From: dene on 6 Sep 2009 20:24 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4aa44eac$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:53:33 -0700, dene wrote: > > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:4aa3e396$0$4943$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:32:46 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: > >> > On 06 Sep 2009 14:43:39 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >>On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:18:28 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: > >> >>> On 06 Sep 2009 02:38:47 GMT, Carbon > >> >>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> In Canada if you're sick and you need expensive care, you get > >> >>>> it, period. > >> >>> > >> >>> Canadians get it all right, but not the way they think. Canada's > >> >>> health care rationing kills. > >> >> > >> >>Spare me the bullshit. > >> > > >> > From the Canadian Supreme Court decision July, 2005. > >> > > >> > "Delays in the public system are widespread and have serious, > >> > sometimes grave, consequences," wrote Chief Justice Beverley > >> > McLachlin and Justice John Major. "Inevitably where patients have > >> > life-threatening conditions, some will die because of undue delay > >> > in awaiting surgery." > >> > > >> > I assume that this decision came after a long trial with many > >> > expert witnesses followed by a period of deliberation. Now if the > >> > greatest legal minds in Canada say that the Canadian health care > >> > system results in people unnecessarily dying, then who am I, or you > >> > for that matter, to disagree. > >> > >> I guess things didn't work out on rec.sport.soccer, huh? > > > > Nice diversion, Carbs, but why don't you address Jack's cite. > > I have addressed Jack's bullshit ad nauseum in the past. Done with that. Then don't criticize what he says. -Greg
From: Carbon on 6 Sep 2009 20:22 On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:24:04 -0700, dene wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4aa44eac$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:53:33 -0700, dene wrote: >> > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> > news:4aa3e396$0$4943$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> >> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:32:46 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: >> >> > On 06 Sep 2009 14:43:39 GMT, Carbon >> >> > <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> >> >>On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:18:28 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: >> >> >>> On 06 Sep 2009 02:38:47 GMT, Carbon >> >> >>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> In Canada if you're sick and you need expensive care, you get >> >> >>>> it, period. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Canadians get it all right, but not the way they think. >> >> >>> Canada's health care rationing kills. >> >> >> >> >> >>Spare me the bullshit. >> >> > >> >> > From the Canadian Supreme Court decision July, 2005. >> >> > >> >> > "Delays in the public system are widespread and have serious, >> >> > sometimes grave, consequences," wrote Chief Justice Beverley >> >> > McLachlin and Justice John Major. "Inevitably where patients >> >> > have life-threatening conditions, some will die because of undue >> >> > delay in awaiting surgery." >> >> > >> >> > I assume that this decision came after a long trial with many >> >> > expert witnesses followed by a period of deliberation. Now if >> >> > the greatest legal minds in Canada say that the Canadian health >> >> > care system results in people unnecessarily dying, then who am >> >> > I, or you for that matter, to disagree. >> >> >> >> I guess things didn't work out on rec.sport.soccer, huh? >> > >> > Nice diversion, Carbs, but why don't you address Jack's cite. >> >> I have addressed Jack's bullshit ad nauseum in the past. Done with >> that. > > Then don't criticize what he says. Why the hell not? He's already worn this newsgroup out. There are plenty more.
From: BAR on 6 Sep 2009 20:30 William Clark wrote: > In article <ki38a5p0ombr0tjfg7p6am76ch5v4cnasm(a)4ax.com>, > Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:49:41 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr >> <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >> >>> Obama, FWIW, needs to >>> come clean on these issues, and either deny Holdren and Emanuel >>> outright, or justify the value of their approaches as potential >>> policy. >> It's not an accident that Obama is surrounded by extreme left-wing >> radicals. I have no doubt that Obama was, and is, more inspired by >> Karl Marx than Thomas Jefferson. > > Christ on a bike - it was so nice when he was too ashamed to show his > face here for eight months. "Christ on a bike" I didn't think good liberals believed in God in any form.
From: Bobby Knight on 6 Sep 2009 20:34 On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:00:25 GMT, assimilate(a)borg.org wrote: > >On 5-Sep-2009, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> So that's KnitWit's excuse.....that it was written out of context, 32 >> years >> >ago. >> >> The out of context argument is complete rubbish. What they say is >> obvious. >> >> The only way to describe the person who wrote these things is as an >> Eco-Fascist. Someone who is willing to suspend democracy, the >> Constitution and human rights to protect the environment. > >You must have hit a nerve Jack. I don't think I've ever seen BK in such a >tizzy. Damned right. He just took some words that an ultra-right web site printed as gospel. You've read my replies, and I stick with them Not advocacy. Period. BK
From: Bobby Knight on 6 Sep 2009 20:37
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:02:54 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > >"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >news:4aa4173d$0$23981$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:34:51 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: >> > On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:49:41 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr >> > <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >> > >> >>Obama, FWIW, needs to come clean on these issues, and either deny >> >>Holdren and Emanuel outright, or justify the value of their approaches >> >>as potential policy. >> > >> > It's not an accident that Obama is surrounded by extreme left-wing >> > radicals. I have no doubt that Obama was, and is, more inspired by >> > Karl Marx than Thomas Jefferson. >> >> You know, there are thousands of Usenet groups... > >Yes...but he brings interesting observations and citations. Scary, huh? > >-Greg > If you like bullshit...as you always have, yes. BK |