Ken's not going to like this
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Support Sharon Angle
Next: Hey democrats
From: Alan Baker on 21 Jul 2010 20:41 In article <8aovg4Fd3kU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message > news:i27g09$7uc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> In article <8aomqqFmbtU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > >>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >>> news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >>> > > >>> > You're just saying that to be contrary. > >>> > > >>> LOL as you would say annoying one. > >> > >> Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. > >> > >> Ken has stated his opinion. > >> > >> Everyone knows Ken's opinion. > >> > >> Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they don't > >> want to hear it again. > >> > >> So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no > >> different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the > >> mosquito that is to blame. > > > > Everyone knows your opinion as well :-) > > > Yes. And telling him we don't want to hear it again, well. I've almost never seen that request, BTW. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dene on 21 Jul 2010 21:38 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-384B9B.17403921072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <i27g09$7uc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > In article <8aomqqFmbtU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > >> news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > >> > > > >> > You're just saying that to be contrary. > > >> > > > >> LOL as you would say annoying one. > > > > > > Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. > > > > > > Ken has stated his opinion. > > > > > > Everyone knows Ken's opinion. > > > > > > Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they don't > > > want to hear it again. > > > > > > So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no > > > different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the > > > mosquito that is to blame. > > > > Everyone knows your opinion as well :-) > > Yup. But I don't object to the flak I get. True. You crave the attention, just like any other two bit troll. -Greg
From: Alan Baker on 21 Jul 2010 21:36 In article <8aplh8F6foU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-384B9B.17403921072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <i27g09$7uc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > In article <8aomqqFmbtU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > >> news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > >> > > > > >> > You're just saying that to be contrary. > > > >> > > > > >> LOL as you would say annoying one. > > > > > > > > Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. > > > > > > > > Ken has stated his opinion. > > > > > > > > Everyone knows Ken's opinion. > > > > > > > > Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they don't > > > > want to hear it again. > > > > > > > > So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no > > > > different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the > > > > mosquito that is to blame. > > > > > > Everyone knows your opinion as well :-) > > > > Yup. But I don't object to the flak I get. > > True. You crave the attention, just like any other two bit troll. > > -Greg LOL Nope. I just don't mind. :-) -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Moderate on 22 Jul 2010 07:05 Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article <i27g09$7uc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >>> In article <8aomqqFmbtU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> >>>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >>>> news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >>>>> >>>>> You're just saying that to be contrary. >>>>> >>>> LOL as you would say annoying one. >>> >>> Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. >>> >>> Ken has stated his opinion. >>> >>> Everyone knows Ken's opinion. >>> >>> Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they > > > don't >>> want to hear it again. >>> >>> So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no >>> different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the >>> mosquito that is to blame. >> >> Everyone knows your opinion as well :-) > > Yup. But I don't object to the flak I get. > > Ken wants the right to rant without getting any flak. That's just one > of > his hypocrisies. But your argument is that Ken is bothering everyone else. What kind of circular logic is that?
From: Alan Baker on 22 Jul 2010 12:25
In article <772356624301488136.451941nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article <i27g09$7uc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> news:alangbaker-EB493D.09542821072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >>> In article <8aomqqFmbtU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >>>> news:alangbaker-2127AD.09084021072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >>>>> > >>>>> You're just saying that to be contrary. > >>>>> > >>>> LOL as you would say annoying one. > >>> > >>> Your grammar is as poor as your thinking. > >>> > >>> Ken has stated his opinion. > >>> > >>> Everyone knows Ken's opinion. > >>> > >>> Nearly everyone has told Ken they know his opinion and that they > > > > don't > >>> want to hear it again. > >>> > >>> So when Ken posts, he creates the annoyance. Replying to that is no > >>> different than slapping a mosquito that has bitten one. It is the > >>> mosquito that is to blame. > >> > >> Everyone knows your opinion as well :-) > > > > Yup. But I don't object to the flak I get. > > > > Ken wants the right to rant without getting any flak. That's just one > > of > > his hypocrisies. > > But your argument is that Ken is bothering everyone else. What kind of > circular logic is that? Explain how it is "circular" at all, Mike. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |