Our tea party friends
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Let us endeavor....
Next: I am Kenneth Gladney
From: William Clark on 28 Mar 2010 11:24 In article <4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > message > > news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > >> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >>> message > >>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>>> In article > >>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > >>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > >>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > >>>>> gladney/ > >>>> > >>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > >>> > >>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > >>> correct? > >> > >> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > > > Just like the New York Times. > > Please tell me you're joking. He can't - he has absolutely no sense of humor.
From: MNMikeW on 29 Mar 2010 10:48 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> message >> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>>> message >>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>>> In article >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >>>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- >>>>>> gladney/ >>>>> >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? >>>> >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true >>>> correct? >>> >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. >> >> Just like the New York Times. > > Please tell me you're joking. The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is.
From: William Clark on 29 Mar 2010 10:52 In article <81bstnFhl5U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> message > >> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > >>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >>>> message > >>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>>>> In article > >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > >>>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > >>>>>> gladney/ > >>>>> > >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > >>>> > >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > >>>> correct? > >>> > >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > >> > >> Just like the New York Times. > > > > Please tell me you're joking. > > The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. Christ on a bike.
From: MNMikeW on 29 Mar 2010 10:53 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-C3CD65.11245528032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> > message >> > news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >> >> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> >>> message >> >>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >>>> In article >> >>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >> >>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to >> >>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- >> >>>>> gladney/ >> >>>> >> >>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? >> >>> >> >>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true >> >>> correct? >> >> >> >> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. >> > >> > Just like the New York Times. >> >> Please tell me you're joking. > > He can't - he has absolutely no sense of humor. What ever you say Mr Kettle.
From: John B. on 29 Mar 2010 11:28
On Mar 29, 10:48 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> message > >>news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>> In article <80s004Fug...(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > >>> <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >>>> message > >>>>news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>>>> In article > >>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0...(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > >>>>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > >>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > > >>>>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > >>>>>> gladney/ > > >>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > > >>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > >>>> correct? > > >>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > >> Just like the New York Times. > > > Please tell me you're joking. > > The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - If not, that says something definitive about newspaper readers. The NYT has a circulation of 928,000 and is generally considered the most influential newspaper in the world. The Wash. Times has a circulation of 102,000 in a metro area of 5 million. |