Our tea party friends
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Let us endeavor....
Next: I am Kenneth Gladney
From: William Clark on 29 Mar 2010 16:31 In article <hoqun5$57m$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-DA5732.14162029032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <81c0kmFa8jU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > >> I see your bias and raise you. > > > > You can't raise your bias any higher. > > Sorry Mike, you lose. Playing no limit, you didn't bring enough of a stake > to the table to out bet Clark. Indeed, I folded on that score long ago.
From: Carbon on 29 Mar 2010 18:23 On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:48:22 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>> message >>> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >>>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>>>> message >>>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>>>> In article >>>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >>>>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to >>>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- >>>>>>> gladney/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? >>>>> >>>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true >>>>> correct? >>>> >>>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. >>> >>> Just like the New York Times. >> >> Please tell me you're joking. > > The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. Are you insane?
From: MNMikeW on 29 Mar 2010 18:35 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4bb12852$0$4986$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:48:22 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>>> message >>>> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >>>>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>>>>> message >>>>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>>>>> In article >>>>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to >>>>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- >>>>>>>> gladney/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? >>>>>> >>>>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true >>>>>> correct? >>>>> >>>>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. >>>> >>>> Just like the New York Times. >>> >>> Please tell me you're joking. >> >> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. > > Are you insane? Do you actually believe the NYT is not biased?
From: Carbon on 29 Mar 2010 19:06 On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:35:57 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4bb12852$0$4986$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:48:22 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>>>> message >>>>> news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>>>> In article <80s004FugaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >>>>>> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>>>>>> message >>>>>>> news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>>>>>> state.edu... >>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719- >>>>>>>> b51f-66d4595a0304(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>> kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick >>>>>>>>> to dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- >>>>>>>>> gladney/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true >>>>>>> correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. >>>>> >>>>> Just like the New York Times. >>>> >>>> Please tell me you're joking. >>> >>> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. >> >> Are you insane? > > Do you actually believe the NYT is not biased? Your claim was that the NYT was as biased as the Washington Times, a cult rag and an embarrassment to journalism.
From: John B. on 29 Mar 2010 19:12
On Mar 29, 6:35 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:4bb12852$0$4986$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:48:22 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >>news:4bae74f0$0$5115$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >>>> message > >>>>news:clark-BFD3D6.12145423032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>>>> In article <80s004Fug...(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > >>>>> <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>>>>> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >>>>>> message > >>>>>>news:clark-26F0AD.09151323032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>>>>>> In article > >>>>>>> <451e2116-4df3-4719-b51f-66d4595a0...(a)19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > >>>>>>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> Why are you so quick to believe Lewis and Conyers and so quick to > >>>>>>>> dismiss the story of Kenneth Gladney? > > >>>>>>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth- > >>>>>>>> gladney/ > > >>>>>>> Because it is in the Moonies' Washington Times? > > >>>>>> So because it appears in the Times it can't possibly be true > >>>>>> correct? > > >>>>> Well, it will almost certainly carry their strong bias. > > >>>> Just like the New York Times. > > >>> Please tell me you're joking. > > >> The Wash. Times is no more biased than the NYT Times is. > > > Are you insane? > > Do you actually believe the NYT is not biased?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The NYT is a liberal paper, but I don't often see its liberalism spilling onto its news pages. I have seen that with the Wahsington Post, especially when Bush was president. The Wash. Times is a conservative paper whose right-wing bias does spill over onto its news pages, and the Times editors even admit it. The whole reason the paper was founded was to provide a conservative alternative to the Wash. Post. The WT will be out of business in a few months. |