Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: David Laville on 11 Feb 2010 19:47 On 11 Feb 2010 01:41:21 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> I'll ask you again, name this masses of racist migrating over to the >> republicans. > >Showing up to spew a little more bile, eh David? Still waiting for that list of racist. >I am sorry that you are >so unhappy in your life. Still waiting for that list of racist. >Perhaps that's what caused you to jump the gun >the way you did. As your own quote observes, before Phillips became a >liberal political commentator he was a campaign strategist for Richard >Nixon. Still waiting for that list of racist. >He obviously would have thoroughly understood the strategies used >in Nixon's campaigns and was therefore more than qualified to speak >about them. Still waiting for that list of racist. What next, you're going to call me a homophobe? Tell me Nixon used to wear black socks? I'll ask you again, name the masses of racist migrating over to the republicans. David Laville G.S.E.M. The Golfing Machine Authorized Instructor
From: Carbon on 11 Feb 2010 20:26 On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:47:09 -0600, David Laville wrote: > On 11 Feb 2010 01:41:21 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> > wrote: > >>> I'll ask you again, name this masses of racist migrating over to >>> the republicans. >> >>Showing up to spew a little more bile, eh David? > > Still waiting for that list of racist. > >>I am sorry that you are so unhappy in your life. > > Still waiting for that list of racist. > >>Perhaps that's what caused you to jump the gun the way you did. As >>your own quote observes, before Phillips became a liberal political >>commentator he was a campaign strategist for Richard Nixon. > > Still waiting for that list of racist. > >>He obviously would have thoroughly understood the strategies used in >>Nixon's campaigns and was therefore more than qualified to speak about >>them. > > Still waiting for that list of racist. > > What next, you're going to call me a homophobe? Tell me Nixon used to > wear black socks? > > I'll ask you again, name the masses of racist migrating over to the > republicans. Individually?
From: William Clark on 11 Feb 2010 20:45 In article <7tiv9iFq1qU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-36E8F4.08004111022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <LhNcn.71268$s%.53944(a)newsfe18.iad>, assimilate(a)borg.org > > wrote: > > > > > On 10-Feb-2010, William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Fact is the TEA party convention drew far fewer people than > anticipated, > > > > and even with Fox News cheerleading it for all it was worth, it was > > > > pretty much a bust for anyone other than the loony right rednecks. > > > > > > that's because the convention is not reflective of the nature of the > > > movement, which is a bottom-up, decentralized affair. > > > > Right. With crib notes scrawled on the palm of your hand. I get it. > > What's the big deal, Billy? Why is it acceptable for a person to take a > sheet of paper up to the podium but it's not ok to put two or three words on > one's hand? Have you ever done some formal public speaking? I have....and > it's not easy. > > -Greg She did take a "sheet of paper" to the podium. That was her "speech" in which she tried to ridicule Obama for using a teleprompter. The "palmy stuff", as she would say, was for a Q&A session, for God's sake, that was already completely staged. She couldn't even remember which of her stupid cliches was supposed to go where. As Steven Colbert says, she is a "f*****g retard", which is OK to say as long as it is satire. Sarah says so. You seem to forget, I am a college professor - public speaking is what I do most days of the week, in classrooms and in large national and international meetings, where the audience is not necessarily friendly. It's fun - it isn't that hard.
From: William Clark on 11 Feb 2010 20:49 In article <MPG.25de13d771e9af21989b8a(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <q4g8n511hap3oijgt187n8vjt7lmk754p0(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:48:21 -0800 (PST), "John B." > > <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >On Feb 11, 8:28�am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > >> In article <clark-3A89FE.08031211022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > >> state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> Why did Obama use a TelePrompter in a room full of 6th graders? > > >> > > >> Why did Obama use a TelePrompter in a room with about 20 people? > > > > > > > >I suppose he used it because he had a prepared speech which he hadn't > > >memorized. What's wrong with that? > > > > Plus the fact that the 6 children and the room of 20 people were not > > the audience...TV coverage live is quite larger. > > > > Silly argument, but that's all Bert > > Spin it anyway you want. But, the picture of Obama's podium and > TelePrompter taking up 60% of a 6th grade classroom doesn't engender a > lot of confidence in Obama's ability to speak to children much less > adults without electronic assistance. Sunshine, he could win world war III, the SuperBowl, the World Series, the NASCAR Spring Cup, and the Open, and your predetermined prejudice would still have to call him a loser.
From: William Clark on 11 Feb 2010 20:51
In article <nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > >The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a long > >way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the TelePrompter. > > > > > Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub > congressmen, all off the cuff? > > BK Yes, he would have had to have palms bigger than New York to keep enough notes on for that marathon. |