From: William Clark on 11 Feb 2010 20:51 In article <4b748c8b$0$5095$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:10:58 -0600, bknight wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > >> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a long > >> way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the TelePrompter. > > > > Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub congressmen, > > all off the cuff? > > That's a touchy subject for the true believers. They appearing to be > ignoring the obvious with all their might. As per usual.
From: William Clark on 11 Feb 2010 20:52 In article <4b74931f$0$5125$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:35:04 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > news:nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com... > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> > >>>The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a > >>>long way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the > >>>TelePrompter. > >> > >> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub > >> congressmen, all off the cuff? > > > > Whipping is subjective. > > It couldn't have been if Fox broke away from the telecast. Yes, the only time you see that is when a college football game gets out of hand, and they cut away to another one.
From: William Clark on 11 Feb 2010 20:55 In article <cit8n5h2ajq9meevkn8fkhp6ugo030il47(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:14:42 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >You keep talking about Bush as a simpleton. But, he was a twice elected > >governor of Texas and twice elected President of the US. If that is a > >simpleton in your books then Obama is a stunning dunce. > > > Besides there's objective data to show Bush to be of superior, to very > superior, intelligence. It's highly unlikely that Obama is that > smart. Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as dumb as paint.
From: dene on 11 Feb 2010 22:24 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-7A2582.20455911022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <7tiv9iFq1qU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > news:clark-36E8F4.08004111022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <LhNcn.71268$s%.53944(a)newsfe18.iad>, assimilate(a)borg.org > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 10-Feb-2010, William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Fact is the TEA party convention drew far fewer people than > > anticipated, > > > > > and even with Fox News cheerleading it for all it was worth, it was > > > > > pretty much a bust for anyone other than the loony right rednecks. > > > > > > > > that's because the convention is not reflective of the nature of the > > > > movement, which is a bottom-up, decentralized affair. > > > > > > Right. With crib notes scrawled on the palm of your hand. I get it. > > > > What's the big deal, Billy? Why is it acceptable for a person to take a > > sheet of paper up to the podium but it's not ok to put two or three words on > > one's hand? Have you ever done some formal public speaking? I have....and > > it's not easy. > > > > -Greg > > She did take a "sheet of paper" to the podium. That was her "speech" in > which she tried to ridicule Obama for using a teleprompter. The "palmy > stuff", as she would say, was for a Q&A session, for God's sake, that > was already completely staged. She couldn't even remember which of her > stupid cliches was supposed to go where. As Steven Colbert says, she is > a "f*****g retard", which is OK to say as long as it is satire. Sarah > says so. > > You seem to forget, I am a college professor - public speaking is what I > do most days of the week, in classrooms and in large national and > international meetings, where the audience is not necessarily friendly. > It's fun - it isn't that hard. You're making a big deal out of nothing. -Greg
From: dene on 11 Feb 2010 22:26
"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <cit8n5h2ajq9meevkn8fkhp6ugo030il47(a)4ax.com>, > Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:14:42 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > >You keep talking about Bush as a simpleton. But, he was a twice elected > > >governor of Texas and twice elected President of the US. If that is a > > >simpleton in your books then Obama is a stunning dunce. > > > > > > Besides there's objective data to show Bush to be of superior, to very > > superior, intelligence. It's highly unlikely that Obama is that > > smart. > > Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as dumb > as paint. Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, or the American electorate who elected this dummy. -Greg |