From: William Clark on
In article <4b748c8b$0$5095$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:10:58 -0600, bknight wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a long
> >> way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the TelePrompter.
> >
> > Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub congressmen,
> > all off the cuff?
>
> That's a touchy subject for the true believers. They appearing to be
> ignoring the obvious with all their might.

As per usual.
From: William Clark on
In article <4b74931f$0$5125$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:35:04 -0600, MNMikeW wrote:
> > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> > news:nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a
> >>>long way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the
> >>>TelePrompter.
> >>
> >> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub
> >> congressmen, all off the cuff?
> >
> > Whipping is subjective.
>
> It couldn't have been if Fox broke away from the telecast.

Yes, the only time you see that is when a college football game gets out
of hand, and they cut away to another one.
From: William Clark on
In article <cit8n5h2ajq9meevkn8fkhp6ugo030il47(a)4ax.com>,
Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:14:42 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> >You keep talking about Bush as a simpleton. But, he was a twice elected
> >governor of Texas and twice elected President of the US. If that is a
> >simpleton in your books then Obama is a stunning dunce.
>
>
> Besides there's objective data to show Bush to be of superior, to very
> superior, intelligence. It's highly unlikely that Obama is that
> smart.

Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as dumb
as paint.
From: dene on

"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wclark2-7A2582.20455911022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <7tiv9iFq1qU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
>
> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> > news:clark-36E8F4.08004111022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > > In article <LhNcn.71268$s%.53944(a)newsfe18.iad>, assimilate(a)borg.org
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 10-Feb-2010, William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Fact is the TEA party convention drew far fewer people than
> > anticipated,
> > > > > and even with Fox News cheerleading it for all it was worth, it
was
> > > > > pretty much a bust for anyone other than the loony right rednecks.
> > > >
> > > > that's because the convention is not reflective of the nature of the
> > > > movement, which is a bottom-up, decentralized affair.
> > >
> > > Right. With crib notes scrawled on the palm of your hand. I get it.
> >
> > What's the big deal, Billy? Why is it acceptable for a person to take a
> > sheet of paper up to the podium but it's not ok to put two or three
words on
> > one's hand? Have you ever done some formal public speaking? I
have....and
> > it's not easy.
> >
> > -Greg
>
> She did take a "sheet of paper" to the podium. That was her "speech" in
> which she tried to ridicule Obama for using a teleprompter. The "palmy
> stuff", as she would say, was for a Q&A session, for God's sake, that
> was already completely staged. She couldn't even remember which of her
> stupid cliches was supposed to go where. As Steven Colbert says, she is
> a "f*****g retard", which is OK to say as long as it is satire. Sarah
> says so.
>
> You seem to forget, I am a college professor - public speaking is what I
> do most days of the week, in classrooms and in large national and
> international meetings, where the audience is not necessarily friendly.
> It's fun - it isn't that hard.

You're making a big deal out of nothing.

-Greg


From: dene on

"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <cit8n5h2ajq9meevkn8fkhp6ugo030il47(a)4ax.com>,
> Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:14:42 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> > >You keep talking about Bush as a simpleton. But, he was a twice elected
> > >governor of Texas and twice elected President of the US. If that is a
> > >simpleton in your books then Obama is a stunning dunce.
> >
> >
> > Besides there's objective data to show Bush to be of superior, to very
> > superior, intelligence. It's highly unlikely that Obama is that
> > smart.
>
> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as dumb
> as paint.

Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, or the
American electorate who elected this dummy.

-Greg