Insurance companies are there to help us. Yeah, right.
in [Golf]
|
From: bknight on 19 Oct 2009 18:34 On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:30:51 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >On Oct 19, 2:28�pm, The Hammer <GaGolfer2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Oct 19, 3:18�pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >> >He doesn't offer anything but a few disconnected statements. There is >no reason to accept any cause/effect associating the events he >describes, let alone his reasoning for the presume co-occurrence...of >course there is no evidence of a co-occurrence of the events >either...just a few disjointed statements..ie *SPIN*! > >The OP is totally devoid of meaning. The OP reported exactly what the Washington Times printed. If you don't understand English its devoid of meaning. BK
From: dene on 19 Oct 2009 18:42 "Dinosaur_Sr" <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote in message news:9eb23e8c-e5d7-49fd-b86f-56b7b0157d9a(a)e34g2000vbc.googlegroups.com... On Oct 19, 2:34 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- state.edu> wrote: > In article <osdpd5p99h6dvbm6bpbjfnusfkj40q2...(a)4ax.com>, > > > > bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:11:31 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr > > <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > Spin, spin spin into incomprehensible gobbledygook. Yup. No different than the OP for this thread. ------------------------------------------------ Whose author promised to never participate in political threads.... -Greg
From: bknight on 19 Oct 2009 19:13 On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:42:16 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > >"Dinosaur_Sr" <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote in message >news:9eb23e8c-e5d7-49fd-b86f-56b7b0157d9a(a)e34g2000vbc.googlegroups.com... >On Oct 19, 2:34 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >state.edu> wrote: >> In article <osdpd5p99h6dvbm6bpbjfnusfkj40q2...(a)4ax.com>, >> >> >> >> bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >> > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:11:31 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr >> > <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: >> > >> >> Spin, spin spin into incomprehensible gobbledygook. > >Yup. No different than the OP for this thread. >------------------------------------------------ > >Whose author promised to never participate in political threads.... > >-Greg > You're kidding. There was nothing political about this thread by me, nor did I respond to anything political. You just can't get anything right. BK
From: Kommienezuspadt on 19 Oct 2009 19:35 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:ftfpd5pqnig8774tmavfm4p1bsatg2id9g(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:18:44 -0400, "Kommienezuspadt" > <NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net> wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:osdpd5p99h6dvbm6bpbjfnusfkj40q28ln(a)4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:11:31 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr >>> <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Oct 19, 1:01 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >>>>state.edu> wrote: >>>>> In article >>>>> <8934936e-f090-4dd9-9841-693d307ef...(a)f10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: >>> >>>>> > Secondly. I heard the same company doled out $4 million to treat a >>>>> > woman with a rare form of breast cancer when they didn't have to. >>>>> > They >>>>> > just comped it to her. >>> >>>>> But you don't have a cite for any of these urban legends, do you? >>>> >>>>Oh, I'm sorry...The Washington Times reported that with respect to >>>>"death panels", in the government plan an "office will be reserved for >>>>people willing to recruit into the government-subsidized health care >>>>system insurance companies that are willing to take money to take >>>>human lives." >>> >>> A perfect example of non sequitur Rob. Spin, spin, spin when you have >>> no answer. >>> >>> Now let's have the cite about what you said above. You know, the $4 >>> million dole out. >>> >>> BK >> >>expect crickets........ >> > Well, at least Rob has the common sense not to overtly defend Guardian > in this specific instance. > > BK and he has the sense to vacate the thread after he has had his head handed to him.
From: Kommienezuspadt on 19 Oct 2009 20:09
"Kommienezuspadt" <NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net> wrote in message news:4adcf7af$0$1560$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com... > > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:ftfpd5pqnig8774tmavfm4p1bsatg2id9g(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:18:44 -0400, "Kommienezuspadt" >> <NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net> wrote: >> >>> >>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>news:osdpd5p99h6dvbm6bpbjfnusfkj40q28ln(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:11:31 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr >>>> <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Oct 19, 1:01 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >>>>>state.edu> wrote: >>>>>> In article >>>>>> <8934936e-f090-4dd9-9841-693d307ef...(a)f10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> > Secondly. I heard the same company doled out $4 million to treat a >>>>>> > woman with a rare form of breast cancer when they didn't have to. >>>>>> > They >>>>>> > just comped it to her. >>>> >>>>>> But you don't have a cite for any of these urban legends, do you? >>>>> >>>>>Oh, I'm sorry...The Washington Times reported that with respect to >>>>>"death panels", in the government plan an "office will be reserved for >>>>>people willing to recruit into the government-subsidized health care >>>>>system insurance companies that are willing to take money to take >>>>>human lives." >>>> >>>> A perfect example of non sequitur Rob. Spin, spin, spin when you have >>>> no answer. >>>> >>>> Now let's have the cite about what you said above. You know, the $4 >>>> million dole out. >>>> >>>> BK >>> >>>expect crickets........ >>> >> Well, at least Rob has the common sense not to overtly defend Guardian >> in this specific instance. >> >> BK > > and he has the sense to vacate the thread after he has had his head handed > to him. oops -- I should looked further down - scratch the he has the sense..... > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4524 (20091019) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4524 (20091019) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com |