Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 23 Jul 2010 00:13 In article <8arstsF33vU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:6teh46lub9c8d66b00erj2obavr1vc1qsp(a)4ax.com... > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>news:k46h46tkt4v0j0c7mfi72hjuqnv4idf4as(a)4ax.com... > >>> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > >>> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Jul 22, 1:02 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Well, my opinion is that removing Saddam was a good thing for the > >>>>> region. > >>>>> The timing is debatable but I believe we would have had to do it > >>>>> eventually > >>>>> anyway. I think Saddam did indeed have WMDs, but they were moved > >>>>> elsewhere > >>>>> before the invasion. > >>>> > >>>>A good thing for the region? So, we went to war there to make life > >>>>better for Iran and Syria? Where do you suppose the WMD was moved to? > >>> > >>> A better question is where was our CIA spy planes when they were > >>> moving all of this equipment? There were no WMDS. > >>> > >>> BK > >> > >>The truck convoys were photographed by satellite in 2002. > >> > > There were reports of such to Syria, but never confirmed by our > > intelligence sources. There were no WMDS. > > > > BK > > They were confirmed. Really? Let's see a quote... ...for once. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Jim Lovejoy on 23 Jul 2010 00:37 William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in news:clark- 15F200.14145521072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu: > Jim, > > You obviously do need to use smaller words and type slower. Right now > you are clearly well beyond their reading and comprehension levels. > > I'll try. But one syllable is as small as I can go, so I doubt I can get to his reading level.
From: Vito Cas on 23 Jul 2010 06:46 What the hell is Sharon Angle doing on topic golf? Don't the editors know what the f--- they are doing?? This discussion format (golf) is always screwed-up... golfdocvc
From: Moderate on 23 Jul 2010 07:31 Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > On Jul 22, 12:20 pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> >> news:alangbaker-0E2AA9.09351722072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> >> >> >>> Armitage wasn't a Clinton appointee. >> >>> He served as an aide to Senator Bob Dole, a foreign policy advisor > > > to >>> Ronald Reagan, was promoted to Deputy Assistant of Defence for Asia > > > and >>> then further promoted to Assistant Secretary of Defence for >>> International Security Policy by his administration. >> >>> In 1993 -- when Clinton was president, he entered the private > > > sector... >> >>> ...where he remained until George W. Bush's presidency. >> >>> So not only is your smoke screen rather obvious, it's just plain > > > wrong. >> >> Armitage served in the Clinton State Department until May 1993. > > So you acknowledge he wasn't a Clinton appointee. He was there when > Clinton arrive and didn't lose his job immediately. > > He worked for Republicans, got his government job and promotions from > Republicans, was re-hired by Republicans. > > In what way does that make him a "Clinton appointee" when he outed > Valerie Plame? > > Were you lying our just ignorant when you made your earlier claim? He was appointed by the Clinton administration. You were ignorant in your claim. Don't try and spin this on me.
From: Moderate on 23 Jul 2010 07:31
"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 22, 4:56 pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:431708b5-f9ff-49d1-ab14-2b3c84176568(a)w30g2000yqw.googlegroups.com... >> On Jul 21, 12:07 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> >>> news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com...> On 21 Jul 2010 >>> 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy. >> >>>> He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us >>>> here. >> >>> If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue >>> whatsoever >>> about the economy. >> >> Unlike those brilliant economists McCain and Palin. >> *********************************************** >> >> They could not be worse than Obama. > > They could and they would. That is partisan foolishness. |