Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 10:29 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-EDDB26.20530921072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <4c4793fd$0$5004$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:54:21 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> > news:3tie469u2r8hi2bd957nnm6prq1vvjhb67(a)4ax.com... >> >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:25:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Guess there were a LOT of non-thinkers in here a couple years ago >> then. >> >>> >> >> There is that in both parties. However, I don't recall anyone >> >> accusing >> >> the Bush administration of corruption, just stupidity. >> > >> > I think Google could refresh your memory. Of course accusing the Obama >> > administration of stupidity, would be, gasp, racist. >> >> You mean Obama personally? You do not get to be a law professor if you're >> stupid. However, if your daddy's a senator, you sometimes do get to fly >> fighter jets. > > As long as it isn't anywhere near the enemy. How many jets did Obama fly? I know his dog just flew on his own private Gulfstream.
From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 10:53 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-504ECB.20542221072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <alangbaker-2DA1B4.17464721072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> In article <8aot2iFtihU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message >> > news:clark-C91EB8.14105621072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > > In article <8aojjaF2atU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> > >> news:wclark2-37FA25.21090720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > >> > In article <MPG.26b002fd77ab853398a140(a)news.giganews.com>, >> > >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> In article <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >> > >> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >> > >> >> > > > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" >> > >> >> > > > has >> > >> >> > > > nothing to >> > >> >> > > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that >> > >> >> > > > you >> > >> >> > > > could >> > >> >> > > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but >> > >> >> > > > that's >> > >> >> > > > the >> > >> >> > > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to be >> > >> >> > > their >> > >> >> > > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or poor >> > >> >> > > candidate >> > >> >> > > won't be determined until after the election. >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark Sanford for >> > >> >> > their >> > >> >> > Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South Carolinians >> > >> >> > and >> > >> >> > their >> > >> >> > ability to handle elections like adults? >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina. >> > >> > >> > >> > Well, it does seem that they could do with adult supervision when >> > >> > it >> > >> > comes to their politics. >> > >> >> > >> Same could be said about the voter fraud morons in Ohio. >> > > >> > > Cite, please? >> > >> > We've been over this before Billy boy. Do your own research for once in >> > your >> > life. >> >> Run away, Mike! > > Indeed - he has no cite; it's just empty blather. > > Caught with the old trousers down, I'm afraid, Mikey! http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2007/11/05/Probation-given-in-recount-rigging-case/UPI-76281194312570/ Googling Ohio voter fraud only returns 127,000 hits.
From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 11:04 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4c479525$0$5001$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:51:57 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4c465058$0$4974$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:13:26 +0000, Moderate wrote: >>>> Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:33:54 +0000, Moderate wrote: >>>>>> Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:32:29 -0700, dene wrote: >>>>>>>> "dsc-ky" <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:05db752e-22da-4c95-91c0- >>>>>>>> c95b3d95e03f(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So what makes "others" right? It's going to mean a lot of money >>>>>>>>> out of out pockets... at the very least. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The insured pay the uninsured medical bills. That's plenty of >>>>>>>> out of pocket for the responsible insured. This distinction >>>>>>>> with O's plan is that the uninsured slacker will have the choice >>>>>>>> to buy insurance or pay extra taxes. Either way, they pay >>>>>>>> instead of us paying their bills for them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are other consequences. I worked with a fellow who had been >>>>>>> laid off for nearly a year due to the recession. He could not >>>>>>> afford COBRA and keep his family fed. He got cancer. He died last >>>>>>> week. >>>>>> >>>>>> How does Obama's plan help your friend? >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't. Universal healthcare would have helped him, but big >>>>> healthcare did everything they could to get that shot down. >>>> >>>> Obama care is big health care. Actually, bigger health care. >>> >>> How do you know his plan will cost more than the system it's >>> replacing? Fox News? >> >> CBO. > > Specifically? http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/115xx/doc11544/Presentation5-26-10.pdf
From: Alan Baker on 22 Jul 2010 12:22 In article <53091742301489069.190718nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article <i27cir$vo9$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> news:alangbaker-351ABA.10151421072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >>> In article <8aon65FodgU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >>>> news:alangbaker-816E1E.09450721072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >>>>> In article <i277h0$n04$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > >>>>> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >>>>>> news:alangbaker-87D77B.08231221072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >>>>>>> In article > >>>>>>> <1988069854301399651.689102nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > >>>>>>> Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Wait: "We know Bush did not lie"???? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Well only those of us who have reviewed all of the Congressional > >>>>>> investigations. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You might want to start with the Silberman-Robb Report. > >>>>> > >>>>> You might want to start there by showing where it concludes that > > > > > > the > >>>>> Bush didn't lie. > >>>>> > >>>> Perhaps you can show us where it concludes he did lie instead of > > > > > your > >>>> textbook LOL bullshit. > >>> > >>> I know that it didn't even examine the question of whether or not > > > > Bush > >>> lied. > >>> > >>> I know that it was chaired by a Republican and a Democrat beholden > > > > to > >>> the administration by virtue of his sitting on the Board of Trustees > > > > of > >>> the MITRE Corporation which has revenues of more than a billion > > > > dollars. > >> > >> So you are saying that Silberman lied? > > > > I'm saying the report didn't even examine the question of lies. > > > >> You conspiracy theorists are too > >> funny. Go with a guess and skip all the facts. > > > > Quote some of these "facts"... > > What lies? Quote the facts? Are you unable to read the report for > yourself? Yup. But you're the one who said it proves your point. *You* quote it. > > You can lead a conspiracy theorist to water, but you can' stop them from > drinking the koolaid. LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 22 Jul 2010 12:24
In article <8ar4bpFansU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-504ECB.20542221072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <alangbaker-2DA1B4.17464721072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > >> In article <8aot2iFtihU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > >> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > >> > news:clark-C91EB8.14105621072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > > In article <8aojjaF2atU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > >> > >> news:wclark2-37FA25.21090720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > >> > In article <MPG.26b002fd77ab853398a140(a)news.giganews.com>, > >> > >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> In article <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >> > >> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >> > >> >> > > > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" > >> > >> >> > > > has > >> > >> >> > > > nothing to > >> > >> >> > > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that > >> > >> >> > > > you > >> > >> >> > > > could > >> > >> >> > > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but > >> > >> >> > > > that's > >> > >> >> > > > the > >> > >> >> > > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to be > >> > >> >> > > their > >> > >> >> > > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or poor > >> > >> >> > > candidate > >> > >> >> > > won't be determined until after the election. > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark Sanford for > >> > >> >> > their > >> > >> >> > Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South Carolinians > >> > >> >> > and > >> > >> >> > their > >> > >> >> > ability to handle elections like adults? > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Well, it does seem that they could do with adult supervision when > >> > >> > it > >> > >> > comes to their politics. > >> > >> > >> > >> Same could be said about the voter fraud morons in Ohio. > >> > > > >> > > Cite, please? > >> > > >> > We've been over this before Billy boy. Do your own research for once in > >> > your > >> > life. > >> > >> Run away, Mike! > > > > Indeed - he has no cite; it's just empty blather. > > > > Caught with the old trousers down, I'm afraid, Mikey! > > http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2007/11/05/Probation-given-in-recount-rigging-case > /UPI-76281194312570/ > > Googling Ohio voter fraud only returns 127,000 hits. Googling "Bush lied" returns 3,600,000 hits. What does that prove? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |