Solitude
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Slicing my 4 iron
Next: Baker is right!
From: Tex on 5 Dec 2007 16:20 On Dec 5, 3:05 pm, Dene <gdst...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Dec 5, 12:57 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Your material is about as old as your rusted, well abused Trophy. > > > Tex > > The "Trophy" Koen-pig refers to is a reference to my beautiful wife. > It shows how low he goes. I haven't even begun to go low Turd for Brains....you want to keep telling everyone how many beers I drink before each post? You see, you fire a shot with a gun, I fire back with a rifle... Tex
From: the Moderator on 5 Dec 2007 16:23 "Dene" <gdstrue(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:e8fa3bad-5a81-4738-8977-710872dddb9a(a)s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > > With him, I consider the source, so I can't say I'm emotionally > bothered by it. I just think the reader should know what kind of a > person Mark Koenig is. Insulting one's wife, who isn't a contributor > here, is waaay over the top. It's not the first time he has insulted > her, nor given his character, will it be his last. The real question > is whether good people like yourself will tolerate this. > > -Greg I am not going to stop reading the newsgroup if that's what you mean.
From: BAR on 5 Dec 2007 16:28 Dene wrote: > On Dec 5, 1:11 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: >> In article >> <377a9304-2279-4ec3-a353-4afb89362...(a)i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, >> >> Dene <gdst...(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> On Dec 5, 12:57 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Your material is about as old as your rusted, well abused Trophy. >>>> Tex >>> The "Trophy" Koen-pig refers to is a reference to my beautiful wife. >>> It shows how low he goes. >>> -Greg >> I had no idea he meant that (if, in fact, he did)... >> >> ...until you explained it. >> >> You want to tell me again how much it bothers you? > > With him, I consider the source, so I can't say I'm emotionally > bothered by it. I just think the reader should know what kind of a > person Mark Koenig is. Insulting one's wife, who isn't a contributor > here, is waaay over the top. It's not the first time he has insulted > her, nor given his character, will it be his last. The real question > is whether good people like yourself will tolerate this. You need to get a thicker, much thicker skin.
From: John van der Pflum on 5 Dec 2007 16:47 On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:59:07 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote: > Of course I know many too, but you obviously missed the point John. > Oh, I think I got the point -- and I can see Rob's point about "true" anonymous people like the various "nomen" people who use remailers to post. IMO, the people mentioned on the previous list use a "handle" to keep their identity somewhat hidden, or at least not fully know. Just because someone uses a handle doesn't mean that they aren't known. -- jvdp http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
From: Bobby Knight on 5 Dec 2007 16:52
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:47:58 -0500, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote: >On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:59:07 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> >wrote: > >> Of course I know many too, but you obviously missed the point John. >> > >Oh, I think I got the point -- and I can see Rob's point about "true" >anonymous people like the various "nomen" people who use remailers to >post. IMO, the people mentioned on the previous list use a "handle" >to keep their identity somewhat hidden, or at least not fully know. > >Just because someone uses a handle doesn't mean that they aren't >known. John, there are posters on RSG who use handles that you don't know. That is the point. Just because someone prefers to remain anon, and I don't include the nomens and Pseudo Borks (who should be kill filed) doesn't mean that they can't post a reasonable question. It's done all of the time. Oh, and the charge that I post anonymously is patently false. bk |