Was Pitts right?
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 15 Dec 2009 22:53 In article <2ufgi5ds5me09q3333ik45r7qrpj6ekmvt(a)4ax.com>, David Laville <dglaville(a)nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:39:50 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > wrote: > > >> Claim you can hit a 2 iron 250 yards and Baker calls you a liar and > >> comes at you with vengeance. > > > >Does he? I'm curious to see where... > > You said you use facts not cheap shots. So where are your facts Larry > couldn't hit a 2 iron 250 yards? Curious to see him do it is not > fact. I'm sorry, but you haven't shown that I actually said that yet. .... > > >> Claim you tossed a club to the ground and Baker calls you a liar and > >> comes at you with vengeance. > > > >Actually, he claimed he didn't throw it at all, and I withdrew the term > >"helicopter" with an apology. Something I never got from Ken (despite > >his acknowledging privately that he owed me one). > > Did you see Ken throw the club or did someone tell you? I actually saw it and it was Ken who called me a liar and later had to admit that he had thrown it. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 15 Dec 2009 22:55 In article <rvfgi558oktdr3t23ruecfdkqti1e85p6v(a)4ax.com>, David Laville <dglaville(a)nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:40:44 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > wrote: > > >> Like the exhibition of cheap shots we saw you take at Larry? > > > >I didn't take any cheap shots at Larry. I used facts. > > Really? Where are your facts he can't hit a 2 iron 250 yards? Where are yours that I ever said that? > Where > are your facts he really wasn't a 8 handicap? He's admitted as much. Would you like to see the posts? IIRC, they were on GolfRewound.com And his current handicap is listed as 17. > > Come on big guy, lets see you lay those facts out for us........ There are a few we need from you first. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 15 Dec 2009 22:58 In article <q7bfi5hqdjsgv9kat2q7g30m53epd3ubiu(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:45:22 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > wrote: > > >In article <7oosm7F3qis1aU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > >> > >> One thing that is interesting about Baker. The moment you appear, he > >> attacks you about a promise you made years ago. However, his buddy Knit > >> made a similar promise about not participating in political threads, and > >> Baker has never said a word to him about it. > >> > >> Why is that??? > >> > >> Answer......hypocrisy. > >> > >> -Greg > > > >Sorry, Greg, but I've never seen that promise. > > Its true Alan. I told Pflum that I'd stop being involved in political > threads. After a while it was either that or just leave RSG. So, yes, > I reneged. And are you ashamed of that fact? Ken certainly isn't. His whole attitude seems to be "Who cares if I gave my word?". > > Sorta like when Greg left RSG and swore that he'd never come back, but > did. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 15 Dec 2009 22:58 In article <845f0b41-360c-4c51-988f-55bc2e9688d8(a)h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, Dene <gdstrue(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Dec 15, 7:39�am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:45:22 -0800, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> > > wrote: > > > > >In article <7oosm7F3qis1...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > >> One thing that is interesting about Baker. �The moment you appear, he > > >> attacks you about a promise you made years ago. �However, his buddy Knit > > >> made a similar promise about not participating in political threads, and > > >> Baker has never said a word to him about it. > > > > >> Why is that??? > > > > >> Answer......hypocrisy. > > > > >> -Greg > > > > >Sorry, Greg, but I've never seen that promise. > > > > Its true Alan. �I told Pflum that I'd stop being involved in political > > threads. �After a while it was either that or just leave RSG. So, yes, > > I reneged. > > > > Sorta like when Greg left RSG and swore that he'd never come back, but > > did. > > > > BK > > All true, but neither you or me attack people regarding reneged > promises. That's uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, schtick. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What do you mean by that, Greg? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 15 Dec 2009 23:01
In article <7oq56iF3ot8rhU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122009(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <7onf4oF3jmqihU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > >> "Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote in message > >> news:MfednXcClrivHLvWnZ2dnUVZ_uZi4p2d(a)supernews.com... > >> > assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/14/09 11:05 AM: > >> > > On 14-Dec-2009, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> More people should adopt that attitude, but they aren't smart enough > >> > >> to know what they don't know. > >> > > > >> > > opinions are not knowledge > >> > > >> > Opinions without knowledge are both utterly pointless and > >> > excruciatingly common on Usenet. > >> > >> In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an > >> opinion > >> on. > >> > >> -Greg > > > > No, there isn't actually. > > > > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em! > > > What exactly would constitute a fact to you anyway? So the parade of bimbos > on the morning shows giving lurid details are not fact? It's a fact they're on the morning shows, but that doesn't make what they are claiming fact. > What about the > published text messages? What about 'em? They are some facts, and I've not denied there are some facts out there. What I've said is that they are far from the whole story of a man. I don't think "there is plenty of knowledge to base an opinion on". > What about the soon to be released pics? "soon to be released" is another way of saying "not yet facts". -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |