From: William Clark on
In article <80fhraFuv0U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> news:ie25q55rsj82knqv74t3tnlutm51lvfb0k(a)4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:06:12 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >>news:vd15q5dviutdv8rvnu53c356lli3fc9bi2(a)4ax.com...
> >>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:11:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >
> >>>>
> >>>>"Don Kirkman" <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote in message
> >>>>news:iql4q5140u2ug1fsma98n4ekc3bv4tdebh(a)4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:49:02 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Didn't Pelosi recently state that "we need to pass the bill so that
> >>>>>>you
> >>>>>>>>will know what is in it/"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't know, did she? If so please show us where and when. Otherwise
> >>>>> you're just casting aspersions, not discussing.
> >>>>> --
> >>>>http://www.breitbart.tv/nancy-pelosi-we-need-to-pass-health-care-bill-to-f
> >>>>ind-out-whats-in-it/
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> The exact quote:
> >>>
> >>> "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
> >>> away from the fog of the controversy".
> >>>
> >>> Makes a little more sense, since she was obviously speaking to the
> >>> public.
> >>>
> >>> BK
> >>>
> >>It still makes NO sense. You do not have to pass a bill to find out what
> >>is
> >>in it. Unless of course, they are trying to hid something. If she truly
> >>wanted to clear the "fog of the controversy", post it so people can ready
> >>it, you know, like Obama promised.
> >>
> >>
> > Unfortunately its still in progress and who knows what last minute
> > changes will be made, so it makes perfect sense to anyone with half a
> > brain. Can you say that you've known every thing in any bill before
> > it has been passed? No.
> >
> > There are always riders and the ubiquitous pork in all of them....at
> > the last minute.
> >
> > BK
>
> Well at least you admit you have half a brain.

I think in his case half a brain is a gross exaggeration.
From: William Clark on
In article <f665q59i9vng50fbaot9sudpdbvrc2icnf(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:47:37 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >news:ie25q55rsj82knqv74t3tnlutm51lvfb0k(a)4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:06:12 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:vd15q5dviutdv8rvnu53c356lli3fc9bi2(a)4ax.com...
> >>>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:11:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>"Don Kirkman" <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:iql4q5140u2ug1fsma98n4ekc3bv4tdebh(a)4ax.com...
> >>>>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:49:02 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Didn't Pelosi recently state that "we need to pass the bill so that
> >>>>>>>you
> >>>>>>>>>will know what is in it/"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I don't know, did she? If so please show us where and when. Otherwise
> >>>>>> you're just casting aspersions, not discussing.
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>http://www.breitbart.tv/nancy-pelosi-we-need-to-pass-health-care-bill-to-
> >>>>>find-out-whats-in-it/
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The exact quote:
> >>>>
> >>>> "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
> >>>> away from the fog of the controversy".
> >>>>
> >>>> Makes a little more sense, since she was obviously speaking to the
> >>>> public.
> >>>>
> >>>> BK
> >>>>
> >>>It still makes NO sense. You do not have to pass a bill to find out what
> >>>is
> >>>in it. Unless of course, they are trying to hid something. If she truly
> >>>wanted to clear the "fog of the controversy", post it so people can ready
> >>>it, you know, like Obama promised.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Unfortunately its still in progress and who knows what last minute
> >> changes will be made, so it makes perfect sense to anyone with half a
> >> brain. Can you say that you've known every thing in any bill before
> >> it has been passed? No.
> >>
> >> There are always riders and the ubiquitous pork in all of them....at
> >> the last minute.
> >>
> >> BK
> >
> >Well at least you admit you have half a brain.
>
> And that you have less.
>
> BK

Amen.
From: bknight on
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:03:11 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>In article <ie25q55rsj82knqv74t3tnlutm51lvfb0k(a)4ax.com>,
>bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:06:12 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>> >news:vd15q5dviutdv8rvnu53c356lli3fc9bi2(a)4ax.com...
>> >> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:11:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >>>
>> >>>"Don Kirkman" <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote in message
>> >>>news:iql4q5140u2ug1fsma98n4ekc3bv4tdebh(a)4ax.com...
>> >>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:49:02 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>Didn't Pelosi recently state that "we need to pass the bill so that you
>> >>>>>>>will know what is in it/"
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I don't know, did she? If so please show us where and when. Otherwise
>> >>>> you're just casting aspersions, not discussing.
>> >>>> --
>> >>>http://www.breitbart.tv/nancy-pelosi-we-need-to-pass-health-care-bill-to-find-out-whats-in-it/
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> The exact quote:
>> >>
>> >> "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
>> >> away from the fog of the controversy".
>> >>
>> >> Makes a little more sense, since she was obviously speaking to the
>> >> public.
>> >>
>> >> BK
>> >>
>> >It still makes NO sense. You do not have to pass a bill to find out what is
>> >in it. Unless of course, they are trying to hid something. If she truly
>> >wanted to clear the "fog of the controversy", post it so people can ready
>> >it, you know, like Obama promised.
>> >
>> >
>> Unfortunately its still in progress and who knows what last minute
>> changes will be made, so it makes perfect sense to anyone with half a
>> brain. Can you say that you've known every thing in any bill before
>> it has been passed? No.
>
>We are not talking about building a highway in Kansas Bobby.
>
>> There are always riders and the ubiquitous pork in all of them....at
>> the last minute.
>
>Nice try but, your position is very tenuous.

LOL. Less than half a brain I see. Myopia is one thing, simple
mindedness is another. You exhibit both.

BK
From: bknight on
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:46:23 -0400, William Clark
<wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote:

>In article <80fhraFuv0U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>> news:ie25q55rsj82knqv74t3tnlutm51lvfb0k(a)4ax.com...

>> >>
>> > Unfortunately its still in progress and who knows what last minute
>> > changes will be made, so it makes perfect sense to anyone with half a
>> > brain. Can you say that you've known every thing in any bill before
>> > it has been passed? No.
>> >
>> > There are always riders and the ubiquitous pork in all of them....at
>> > the last minute.
>> >
>> > BK
>>
>> Well at least you admit you have half a brain.
>
>I think in his case half a brain is a gross exaggeration.

I'm sure that you're not referring to me, but this is misleading.

BK
From: William Clark on
In article <rld5q5tuuiqsqiv6ua68o4r7hu5vbvhnve(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:46:23 -0400, William Clark
> <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <80fhraFuv0U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >> news:ie25q55rsj82knqv74t3tnlutm51lvfb0k(a)4ax.com...
>
> >> >>
> >> > Unfortunately its still in progress and who knows what last minute
> >> > changes will be made, so it makes perfect sense to anyone with half a
> >> > brain. Can you say that you've known every thing in any bill before
> >> > it has been passed? No.
> >> >
> >> > There are always riders and the ubiquitous pork in all of them....at
> >> > the last minute.
> >> >
> >> > BK
> >>
> >> Well at least you admit you have half a brain.
> >
> >I think in his case half a brain is a gross exaggeration.
>
> I'm sure that you're not referring to me, but this is misleading.
>
> BK

Sorry, of course it wasn't you I was referring to, but the poster before
that.

Oops :-)