Liberal solution to illegal immigration
in [Golf]
|
Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: bknight on 7 May 2010 18:54 On Fri, 7 May 2010 17:28:35 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <gu28u5doi63n3ebjlbv3ft41ovfpbg76mh(a)4ax.com>, >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> On Fri, 7 May 2010 07:57:12 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <20a69e5b-9f5c-41b3-890a-38f9e47ef86c@ >> >37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... >> >> >> >> On May 6, 9:28�pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On May 6, 6:09�pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:44:47 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> > > >I would use the US military to secure our borders. Anyone attempting to >> >> > > >cross at any point other than an official US border crossing will be >> >> > > >shot dead on sight. >> >> > >> >> > > This kind of shallow thought is to be expected of you. �The death >> >> > > penalty, without legal recourse? >> >> > >> >> > > You're pitiful. >> >> > >> >> > > BK >> >> > >> >> > That's about what the Mexicans do on their southern border. >> >> > >> >> > Ken >> >> >> >> No it isn't, but what if it were? That would make it OK for us to do >> >> it, too? >> > >> >Reciprocity? It is an interesting concept Johnny. Hell we use it within >> >the USA all of the time. How do you think your marriage in one state is >> >recognized in another state? >> >> Another inane, childish, comparison. You really ought to have your >> posts edited by a fifth grader. > >I don't know why you have a problem with reciprocity other then the fact >the it doesn't fit your political objectives. > >Main Entry: rec�i�proc�i�ty >Pronunciation: \?re-s?-?pr�-s(?-)te-\ >Function: noun >Inflected Form(s): plural rec�i�proc�i�ties >Date: 1766 > >1 : the quality or state of being reciprocal : mutual dependence, >action, or influence >2 : a mutual exchange of privileges; specifically : a recognition by one >of two countries or institutions of the validity of licenses or >privileges granted by the other Are you serious? There's no question about the definition, and it has nothing to do with politics. Your lame brain can't understand that. One thing that separates us from most of the rest of the world is our legal system, and a dolt like you would want to adopt Mexico's. BK
From: bknight on 7 May 2010 18:55 On Fri, 7 May 2010 17:29:45 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <0c28u598sqi7oo217vcp02joc3b769eos4(a)4ax.com>, >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> On Fri, 7 May 2010 07:55:52 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <lqi6u55nqa7kk6in6129j637l8enunpe10(a)4ax.com>, >> >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> >> >> On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:44:47 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >I would use the US military to secure our borders. Anyone attempting to >> >> >cross at any point other than an official US border crossing will be >> >> >shot dead on sight. >> >> > >> >> >> >> This kind of shallow thought is to be expected of you. The death >> >> penalty, without legal recourse? >> >> >> >> You're pitiful. >> > >> >Shallow? Who is coming across the southern border? Do you have any idea? >> >It is not just poor migrant workers. >> > >> That gives simplistic, shallow, BAR the right to kill them all. >> Benevolently, you would stop short of raping the women, unlike >> LLLLLLLarry, another fool. >> >> Once in a while you show glimmers of mediocre intelligence. This >> isn't one of those times. > >Anything except addressing the issue, Bobby. > The issue was well addressed. You're too lame brained to even recognize it. BK >
From: Carbon on 7 May 2010 19:01 On Fri, 07 May 2010 08:01:16 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4be3461c$0$18607$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Thu, 06 May 2010 18:34:15 -0400, BAR wrote: >>> In article <4be2ad6b$0$4893$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, >>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >>> >>>> So ends our discussion of the blindingly obvious. >>> >>> Why, because you said so? Did you go to the Billy Clark school of >>> discussion? >> >> The notion that politicians of both parties routinely do favors in >> exchange for campaign contributions is so self-evidently true that I >> thought even people as biased as yourself would instantly grasp it. I >> sincerely apologize if I have over-estimated your capacity for >> rational thought. > > Tell us the party the continually rails against big business yet is > always in the top spots on the contribution lists. Take a guess who > the biggest recipient of BP money was in 2008. You know, the company > with the boot on their throats. Oh god. You're actually suggesting that one group of politicians is somehow less corrupt than another group of politicians, when both groups face the same pressures to raise money to get re-elected, etc. etc.? I'm not even sure where to start with that. Washington is an equal opportunity corruptor.
From: John B. on 7 May 2010 19:09 On May 7, 5:28 pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <gu28u5doi63n3ebjlbv3ft41ovfpbg7...(a)4ax.com>, > bkni...(a)conramp.net says... > > > > > > > On Fri, 7 May 2010 07:57:12 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > >In article <20a69e5b-9f5c-41b3-890a-38f9e47ef86c@ > > >37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > >> On May 6, 9:28 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > On May 6, 6:09 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > >> > > On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:44:47 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > >> > > >I would use the US military to secure our borders. Anyone attempting to > > >> > > >cross at any point other than an official US border crossing will be > > >> > > >shot dead on sight. > > > >> > > This kind of shallow thought is to be expected of you. The death > > >> > > penalty, without legal recourse? > > > >> > > You're pitiful. > > > >> > > BK > > > >> > That's about what the Mexicans do on their southern border. > > > >> > Ken > > > >> No it isn't, but what if it were? That would make it OK for us to do > > >> it, too? > > > >Reciprocity? It is an interesting concept Johnny. Hell we use it within > > >the USA all of the time. How do you think your marriage in one state is > > >recognized in another state? > > > Another inane, childish, comparison. You really ought to have your > > posts edited by a fifth grader. > > I don't know why you have a problem with reciprocity other then the fact > the it doesn't fit your political objectives. > > Main Entry: rec·i·proc·i·ty > Pronunciation: \?re-s?-?prä-s(?-)te-\ > Function: noun > Inflected Form(s): plural rec·i·proc·i·ties > Date: 1766 > > 1 : the quality or state of being reciprocal : mutual dependence, > action, or influence > 2 : a mutual exchange of privileges; specifically : a recognition by one > of two countries or institutions of the validity of licenses or > privileges granted by the other Your use of the word "reciprocity" might hold water if the Mexicans were in the habit of shooting Americans who cross the Rio Grande illegally, but I don't think they are.
From: John B. on 7 May 2010 19:10
On May 7, 5:31 pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <15e109f3-c8f4-4e85-b67e-00e442e6c3d9 > @e1g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > The Marielitos who came here in 1980 are the most successful immigrant > > group in the U.S. They have built a highly prosperous diaspora in > > Where's your proof? In Miami. |