Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: MNMikeW on 7 May 2010 09:57 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:oi48u5lepg7vmo2ed396ibac51c81asftp(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:05:30 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > > >>> >>Leftys don't want borders. >> > Why do you make such statements???? > > There's too much "righty", "lefty" bullshit being thrown around, just > disparaging epithets tossed out at anyone who disagrees with another's > thoughts . Everything isn't dependent on political thought. > > I don't know anyone that doesn't want to see the influx of illegal's > contained. Absolutely no one, and I'll bet that you can't come up > with anyone either. > > The problem is way to complicated for the simplistic pap that's > proposed here though. > > > BK > I notice your ire is only raised when a righty does it. Randys solution was spot on. Now we just need somebody with a pair to implement it.
From: bknight on 7 May 2010 10:09 On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:57:08 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:oi48u5lepg7vmo2ed396ibac51c81asftp(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:05:30 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>Leftys don't want borders. >>> >> Why do you make such statements???? >> >> There's too much "righty", "lefty" bullshit being thrown around, just >> disparaging epithets tossed out at anyone who disagrees with another's >> thoughts . Everything isn't dependent on political thought. >> >> I don't know anyone that doesn't want to see the influx of illegal's >> contained. Absolutely no one, and I'll bet that you can't come up >> with anyone either. >> >> The problem is way to complicated for the simplistic pap that's >> proposed here though. >> >> >> BK >> >I notice your ire is only raised when a righty does it. At this point the only ire of mine raised was at Bert's idiocy. He happens to be a shallow thinker, politically and as a human being. > Randys solution was spot on. Now we just need somebody with a pair to implement it. You mean his reference to Bert doing his lawn? :-) Yep, spot on. BK > >
From: R&B on 7 May 2010 11:52 On 2010-05-07 08:54:54 -0400, MNMikeW said: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4be34111$0$4888$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Thu, 06 May 2010 12:49:06 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>> "R&B" <none_of_your_business(a)all.com> wrote in message >>> news:2010050612314318056-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom... >>> >>>> But as to the Arizona law specifically... >>>> >>>> But where the Arizona law really runs into problems is where police >>>> in that state won't stop me because I "look" illegal, but they could >>>> stop Maria or Miguel, my neighbors, who are both second-generation US >>>> citizens, both born in this country to immigrant citizens of the US. >>>> That's where this law runs into serious constitutional questions. >>>> And that's why I oppose it. It places legal citizens in situations >>>> we've only read about in history books and seen in movies about the >>>> Gestapo in Germany. It's unAmerican. >>> >>> This is wrong Randy. The law specifically states there must be lawful >>> contact BEFORE any paper checking can happen. They cannot simply pull >>> you over for looking a specific way. >> >> Yeah, because the police would never routinely pull visible minorities >> over like that. > > Like they do now right? Yes, like they do right now. Randy
From: dene on 7 May 2010 12:00 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:oi48u5lepg7vmo2ed396ibac51c81asftp(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:05:30 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >Leftys don't want borders. > > > Why do you make such statements???? > > There's too much "righty", "lefty" bullshit being thrown around, just > disparaging epithets tossed out at anyone who disagrees with another's > thoughts . Everything isn't dependent on political thought. > > I don't know anyone that doesn't want to see the influx of illegal's > contained. Absolutely no one, and I'll bet that you can't come up > with anyone either. > > The problem is way to complicated for the simplistic pap that's > proposed here though. Ok. What are your ideas to "contain" the problem? -Greg
From: bknight on 7 May 2010 12:11
On Fri, 7 May 2010 09:00:25 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:oi48u5lepg7vmo2ed396ibac51c81asftp(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:05:30 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >Leftys don't want borders. >> > >> Why do you make such statements???? >> >> There's too much "righty", "lefty" bullshit being thrown around, just >> disparaging epithets tossed out at anyone who disagrees with another's >> thoughts . Everything isn't dependent on political thought. >> >> I don't know anyone that doesn't want to see the influx of illegal's >> contained. Absolutely no one, and I'll bet that you can't come up >> with anyone either. >> >> The problem is way to complicated for the simplistic pap that's >> proposed here though. > >Ok. What are your ideas to "contain" the problem? > >-Greg > I'm smart enough to know that I don't have the answers. BK |