From: Jack Hollis on
On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:38:24 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
<johnb505(a)> wrote:

>> Exactly, if it was impossible for them to work here they'd stay home.
>> Why would they make the trip for nothing.
>How would we make it impossible for them to work here?

If the penalties for hiring an illegal alien were sever enough and
there was enough enforcement, a lot of the jobs would dry up. Then if
you made it very difficult to cross the border, there would no longer
be any reason for illegal's to come to the US and it would also
encourage the ones that are here to go home.

From: kenpitts on
On May 7, 8:26 am, bkni...(a) wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:05:30 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)>
> wrote:
> >Leftys don't want borders.
> Why do you make such statements????  
> There's too much "righty", "lefty" bullshit being thrown around, just
> disparaging epithets tossed out at anyone who disagrees with another's
> thoughts . Everything isn't dependent on political thought.
>   I don't know anyone that doesn't want to see the influx of illegal's
> contained.  Absolutely no one, and I'll bet that you can't come up
> with anyone either.
>   The problem is way to complicated for the simplistic pap that's
> proposed here though.  
> BK

Simplistic? You mean like the president? Arizona's law only gives law
enforcement in Arizona a charter to enforce federal law. So, if you
are in Arizona illegally, you will be sent back from whence you came.

From: Jack Hollis on
On Thu, 6 May 2010 19:58:10 -0700 (PDT), kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)>

>> The Netherlands has an extremely liberal policy wrt drugs and all the
>> evidence I've seen suggests that the per capita social/financial costs
>> are much lower.- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
>And Amsterdam is an absolute cesspool because of their lax attitudes.

I'm not sure what you mean by cesspool, but the only drug that is
"legal" in NL is weed and hash (same drug). Amsterdam has a few rough
areas, but nothing that compares to what you find in every major
American city.
From: kenpitts on
On May 7, 6:55 am, BAR <sc...(a)> wrote:
> In article <lqi6u55nqa7kk6in6129j637l8enunp...(a)>,
> bkni...(a) says...
> > On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:44:47 -0400, BAR <sc...(a)> wrote:
> > >I would use the US military to secure our borders. Anyone attempting to
> > >cross at any point other than an official US border crossing will be
> > >shot dead on sight.
> > This kind of shallow thought is to be expected of you.  The death
> > penalty, without legal recourse?
> > You're pitiful.
> Shallow? Who is coming across the southern border? Do you have any idea?
> It is not just poor migrant workers.
> And, every government official has sworn an oath to protect us from all
> enemies, foreign and domestic. The problem with the Democrats is that
> the only enemies they see are their political opponents at the ballot
> box.

You are right about that BAR. Democrats from the past that loved this
country (Scoop Jackson, Sam Nunn, JFK, Truman) would no more sign on
with this present bunch than the man in the moon. To curent Democrats,
conservatives are the enemy and illegal aliens mean more potential
votes. Even though they are countrymen. Harry Reid would sell his own
mother to get back in the race in Nevada.

BTW, have you noticed how liberals were out in force to try to deflect
blame away from Muslim extremists on this Times Square deal until they
had no choice but to admit it?

It is amazing the lack of leadership we see every day with this crew.
To them, conservatives and the military are the enemy.

From: Jack Hollis on
On Thu, 06 May 2010 22:34:26 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)>

>And being a synthetic opioid does *not* make it synthetic heroin.

Of course it does. Heroin is a non-synthetic opioid.