Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 15 Feb 2010 20:39 On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:28:15 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4b79e07b$0$4847$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:40:01 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:wclark2-56C41F.21534213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>> In article <MPG.25e0f00f67ae0047989bb6(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR >>>> <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>> In article <wclark2-9805B4.14134813022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>>>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >>>>>> In article <MPG.25e0b2f129e9b2f4989bb5(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR >>>>>> <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>>>>>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A >>>>>>>> without scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why not ask Barbara Boxer? >>>>>> >>>>>> Because I am asking you. >>>>> >>>>> Again, missing the point Billy. If writing on your hand is good >>>>> enough for Barbara Boxer it should be good enough for everyone? >>>> >>>> So you do agree about SarahQuitter, then? Good. >>> >>> Clark agrees that Barbara Boxer is a 3rd grader. >> >> You know the picture of her with writing on her hand is from like >> 1990, correct? > > Of course that makes it all better. It makes it sad and small and desperate.
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 20:40 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b79e525$0$4859$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:35:36 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4b75ed61$0$5077$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:41:27 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>>> <assimilate(a)borg.org> wrote in message >>>> news:uE6dn.71265$RS6.56746(a)newsfe15.iad... >>>>> On 11-Feb-2010, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Obama desperately needs the Palin distraction. As long as his allies >>>>>> in the liberal press talk about Palin 24/7 it detracts from his >>>>>> miserable polling numbers. Not to mention his socialist takeover of >>>>>> the US. >>>>> >>>>> nothing else would explain the obession with someone out of public >>>>> office for 6-9 months >>>> >>>> Yes funny they are not all over the Edwards circus. Oh, that's right, >>>> he's a Democrat. >>> >>> He's a has-been. >> >> Your hypocrisy is astounding. > > He is a has-been. It would be like trying to go after Tom DeLay for > having an affair. He's also a has-been and we already know he's a > douchebag. No one would care. Humm. ABC just did a GMA segment on JFK's affair with Georgey Stephanopoulis nearly wetting himself over it. Of course had JFK been a Republican it would have been reported quite differently.
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 20:41 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-0A8EC3.19242415022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <7tte2tFus6U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:wclark2-B3D61E.12232213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > In article >> > <b33ef4c0-206d-44a8-a5b2-84e3e97ccad8(a)h2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, >> > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >> > >> >> On Feb 13, 10:39 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > In article >> >> > <6ea6aa0b-dd0f-4933-bfd0-2b763861e...(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: >> >> > > On Feb 12, 2:01 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >> >> > > state.edu> wrote: >> >> > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, >> >> > >> >> > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >> >> > > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote >> >> > > > > in >> >> > > > > message >> >> > > > >news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >> > > > > > In article <hl3k94$33...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >> >> > > > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message >> >> > > > > > >news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> >> > >> >> > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in >> >> > > > > > > > message >> >> > > > > > > >news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state >> >> > > > > > > >.ed >> >> > > > > > > >u... >> >> > >> >> > > > > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and >> >> > > > > > > >> again - >> >> > > > > > > >> he's as >> >> > > > > dumb >> >> > > > > > > >> as paint. >> >> > >> >> > > > > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of >> >> > > > > > > > Gore, >> >> > > > > > > > Kerry, or >> >> > > > > the >> >> > > > > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy. >> >> > >> >> > > > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other >> >> > > > > > > people's >> >> > > > > > > intelligence. What a boob. >> >> > >> >> > > > > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go >> >> > > > > > find >> >> > > > > > some. >> >> > >> >> > > > > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. >> >> > >> >> > > > > -Greg >> >> > >> >> > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a >> >> > > > frightening >> >> > > > indictment of the Americn electorate. >> >> > >> >> > > Hardly in the same league as electing any Labour Party candidate >> >> > > in >> >> > > any context! >> >> > >> >> > Get back on your meds - quickly. >> >> >> >> So you agree with me that electing Labour party candidates is a >> >> frightening indictment of the British electorate. >> > >> > No, I agree that you need to start taking your medication again. You >> > are >> > becoming delusionally schizophrenic. >> >> Classic Clark denial. > > Have you learnt the difference between Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein > yet? There really is not much difference at all.
From: Carbon on 15 Feb 2010 20:41 On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:30:54 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4b79e473$0$4859$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:34:43 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:4b75ed2d$0$5077$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:34:03 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:4b7494aa$0$31017$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:14:21 -0800, dene wrote: >>>>>>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:7tiptpFq3qU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama >>>>>>>>>> has a long way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of >>>>>>>>>> the TelePrompter. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub >>>>>>>>> congressmen, all off the cuff? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Whipping is subjective. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Agree. Saw the whole thing. Both sides rose to the occasion >>>>>>> and it was a healthy exchange. "Whipping" is a gross >>>>>>> overstatement. >>>>>> >>>>>> The GOP lined up for an hour and asked him prepared question >>>>>> after prepared question. They gained no ground whatsoever. Call >>>>>> it whatever you want. The Republicans know what happened and will >>>>>> never invite him to another debate like this again. >>>>> >>>>> Pulhleese. Like they're scared of Obama. >>>> >>>> They are now. >>> >>> You keep telling yourself that Carbs. >> >> What do you think the chances are they'll ever ask him to another >> live, unscripted television debate? > > Pretty good. Ain't gonna happen.
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 20:46
"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b79f75c$0$4858$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:28:15 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4b79e07b$0$4847$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:40:01 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >>>> news:wclark2-56C41F.21534213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>>> In article <MPG.25e0f00f67ae0047989bb6(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR >>>>> <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>> In article <wclark2-9805B4.14134813022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>>>>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >>>>>>> In article <MPG.25e0b2f129e9b2f4989bb5(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR >>>>>>> <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>>>>>>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A >>>>>>>>> without scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why not ask Barbara Boxer? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because I am asking you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, missing the point Billy. If writing on your hand is good >>>>>> enough for Barbara Boxer it should be good enough for everyone? >>>>> >>>>> So you do agree about SarahQuitter, then? Good. >>>> >>>> Clark agrees that Barbara Boxer is a 3rd grader. >>> >>> You know the picture of her with writing on her hand is from like >>> 1990, correct? >> >> Of course that makes it all better. > > It makes it sad and small and desperate. LOL! I'll have to remember that. |