Liberal solution to illegal immigration
in [Golf]
|
Prev: March of the Titans (brief video re: White Race, 1 min, 30sec)
Next: What the heck is Tiger doing?
From: BAR on 29 May 2010 15:48 In article <4c012614$0$4969$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Sat, 29 May 2010 09:32:24 -0400, BAR wrote: > > In article <4c010e27$0$5032$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> > >> You don't realize that the problem is complex because you are incapable > >> of complex thought. Hope this helps. > > > > In Prince William County Virginia they started to crack down on illegal > > aliens. All of the illegal aliens moved out of the county and the crime > > rate dropped nearly 40%. Forty percent, that is an amazing amount of > > crime attributed to illegal aliens. I just wish my county had the balls > > to implement the same thing but, we are a sanctuary county and you can > > see the writing on the wall. Gangs are moving in, the school system's > > once stellar record, either 1 or 2 in the nation, is in free-fall. Our > > jail demographics are 50% illegal alien and 50% non-illegal alien. > > > > Again, the problem is one of political will and not complexity. > > You probably imagine you've established some sort of causal connection > between the crime rate and illegal immigration in these two counties. > Please refer to my previous comment, above. Enforce the law and the crime rate goes down. Don't enforce the law and the crime rate stays the same or goes up.
From: BAR on 29 May 2010 15:49 In article <4c01268a$0$4969$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Sat, 29 May 2010 09:34:24 -0400, BAR wrote: > > In article <4c010d8b$0$5032$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> On Sat, 29 May 2010 07:20:04 -0400, BAR wrote: > >>> In article <4c005d51$0$4835$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > >>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >>>> On Fri, 28 May 2010 19:28:05 -0400, BAR wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> How is your visa? Has it expired? > >>>> > >>>> I win yet again. > >>> > >>> So your visa is up to date? Don't you have a green card yet? > >> > >> Poor Bert, reduced to blurting out the same ridiculous platitudes > >> over and over. Seems like there are some pretty serious side effects > >> to having a walnut-sized brain. But hey, at least you remember to > >> breathe so it's not all bad. > > > > Is your visa up to date? Has it expired? Or, are you a green card > > holder. There is no shame in answering the question. But, it does put > > your position on the issue into the proper light. > > > > I will assume that you are here on a visa and that you have overstayed > > your visa. Your leanings on the issue are similar to those of illegal > > aliens. > > Your leanings on the issue are similar to those of idiots. You views are biased due to the fact that you are on the verge of being an illegal alien yourself.
From: Don Kirkman on 29 May 2010 16:06 On Sat, 29 May 2010 09:32:24 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In Prince William County Virginia they started to crack down on illegal >aliens. All of the illegal aliens moved out of the county and the crime >rate dropped nearly 40%. Forty percent, that is an amazing amount of >crime attributed to illegal aliens. I just wish my county had the balls >to implement the same thing but, we are a sanctuary county and you can >see the writing on the wall. Gangs are moving in, the school system's >once stellar record, either 1 or 2 in the nation, is in free-fall. Our >jail demographics are 50% illegal alien and 50% non-illegal alien. So you don't have any citizen criminals in your jails? Incredible policing you've got there. And maybe a little bit of profiling. -- Don Kirkman donsno2(a)charter.net
From: Howard Brazee on 29 May 2010 19:57 On Sat, 29 May 2010 09:39:24 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >I am not "from the Religious Right." You would do better to lump me in >with the founding fathers and their views. I didn't lump you anywhere. I was just conversing. >> >However, if you vote for whom your pastor or priest tells you to vote >> >for you should stay out of the polling places. >> >> Pastor or priest or talk show host or newspaper or corporation or >> advertisement... > >Do you vote for what is best for you or what is best for the country and >its future? That is my attempt. I don't accept some "authority" to tell me which way to vote. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on 29 May 2010 20:05
On Sat, 29 May 2010 13:06:20 -0700, Don Kirkman <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote: >Also true. But don't equate that with situational ethics, which holds >that there is an flexible but reasoned ethical approach to social >problems. SE is not adjusting to fit one's wants but adjusting to fit >the needs of the situation. IOW, it's a flexible approach, not a >legalistic approach. Earlier, I think it was you who mentioned "What >would Jesus do"; part of the authorities' opposition to Jesus was that >he rejected their legalism and taught reasoned behavior based on the >*principles* of their religion. What are the examples of "situational ethics" that the Right accuses the Left of having? Do they fit the definition you gave above? Or do they fit the same kind of shoehorn ethics we find all over? -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |