From: Carbon on
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:45:07 -0800, Dinosaur_Sr wrote:
> On Feb 17, 12:57 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:38:52 +0000, assimilate wrote:
>>> On 16-Feb-2010, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> It's a nice fantasy, appealing in its brainless simplicity:
>>>>>> Liberals blow money and Conservatives do not.
>>
>>>>> You're the simple one, as those are your words. I've stated many
>>>>> times and in great detail how to lower healthcare costs. What you
>>>>> call reform will not do it. It goes against the basic laws of
>>>>> economics.
>>
>>>> Back here on planet earth, what I call reform is what is otherwise
>>>> known as universal healthcare. Everywhere it has been implemented
>>>> (in the first world at least) it has been much less expensive per
>>>> capita than US healthcare and has also produced better results in
>>>> the form of average life expectancy
>>
>>> But you can't say what their systems would be if they had not gone
>>> down the economy stifling path of UHS now can you? Can you tell me
>>> that Britain's NHS won't implode under the weight of bommer aging?
>>> It is already showing stress. Life expectancy does not relate
>>> exclusively to healthcare, if fact, after the 1st few fragile years
>>> of life, it is almost divorced from it.
>>
>> Economy stifling? Bill, what the hell are you talking about? The US
>> system is the most expensive in the world by far. Countries with
>> rational healthcare systems have a lot less to worry about than the
>> US does.
>
> So what is US health care costs more? If the American people want it
> that way, that's the way it should be.

In my experience people do not like getting ripped off.
From: MNMikeW on

"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4b7c5d2c$0$4850$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:58:20 -0800, dene wrote:
>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:4b7b6ecb$0$4944$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:58:48 -0500, William Clark wrote:
>>
>>> I can certainly vouch for that. I went to emergency last summer. There
>>> were a lot of underclass unemployed looking people in the waiting room.
>>> I talked to the doctor for one (1) minute. No treatment was performed.
>>> The cost: around $500.
>>
>> Underclass? I thought liberal dogma teaches that "we're all the same."
>
> If I can smell them from across the waiting room then they are clearly
> different from me. If they want to lay around all day and be losers,
> that's great. I don't care. But I shouldn't have to get stuck paying for
> them. That is exactly what is happening in this broken system. Don't you
> think it's wrong?

Yes it is wrong. But Obamacare will do the same thing. YOU will be stuck
paying for them.


From: dene on

"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4b7c5d2c$0$4850$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:58:20 -0800, dene wrote:
> > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:4b7b6ecb$0$4944$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> >> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:58:48 -0500, William Clark wrote:
> >
> >> I can certainly vouch for that. I went to emergency last summer. There
> >> were a lot of underclass unemployed looking people in the waiting room.
> >> I talked to the doctor for one (1) minute. No treatment was performed.
> >> The cost: around $500.
> >
> > Underclass? I thought liberal dogma teaches that "we're all the same."
>
> If I can smell them from across the waiting room then they are clearly
> different from me. If they want to lay around all day and be losers,
> that's great. I don't care. But I shouldn't have to get stuck paying for
> them. That is exactly what is happening in this broken system. Don't you
> think it's wrong?

Did I just get a whiff of personal responsibility in this diatribe? There's
hope for you, Carbs!!! ;>


From: gray asphalt on

"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message
news:7u300eFgdqU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "gray asphalt" <dontwrite(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:d7Xen.8$Ee1.4(a)newsfe12.iad...
>>
>> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message
>> news:7tnb50Fs8nU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> >
>> > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> > news:4b75e854$0$21064$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> >> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:27:03 -0500, BAR wrote:
>> >> > In article <oy0dn.144819$kQ5.41489(a)newsfe08.iad>,
>> >> > dontwrite(a)gmail.com
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Great! I'd like healthcare that covers me for every possible illness
>> >> with no upfront co-pays at less than 2/3 of what I'm paying now, with
> no
>> >> exclusions for pre-existing conditions and where the insurance company
>> >> can never drop coverage. In return I will agree to Tort reform, such
>> >> that I will never expect an honest mistake to be equivalent to winning
>> >> the lottery.
>> >
>> > Yeah....liberals are great at spending other people's money.
>> >
>> > -Greg
>>
>> And banks, tobacco companies, auto manufacturers,
>> health insurance companies, oil companies, mortgage
>> companies, defense industry ... campanies are great at
>> stealing other people's money. Where's my list? Did I
>> forget anyone? How about fructose companies ... security
>> companies ala Blackwater, wall street in general ...
>> Oh yeah, Madison Avenue, who has created synicism
>> and deep rooted fear in the basic honesty of the American
>> people, especially in children who watch false adverstising...
>> Did I forget media in general?
>
> All the ones you mention are ultimately accountable to the consumer. You
> have the choice whether you want to do business with them. Do you have
> that
> choice with your taxes? Who is government accountable to? If you think
> the
> voters, then consider why the government is growing 5% while business and
> personal revenues are stagnant or shrinking.
>
> -Greg

And the people who died in Bopol, India from Union
Carbide are going to stop doing business. I guess. And
the people who died in Ford Pintos, yeah they will stop
doing business with Ford. And the thousands of people
who die every year in hospitals from malpractice are
definitely going to go somewhere in the next life. Them
stupid people who expect for the government to protect
them from innocent buisnesses ... And I'm pretty sure the
people who were suckered into bad loans will not
finance with the same companies ... well not for a few
years after they partially recover from bankruptcy.

Yep, the American dream. Cheat your neighbors. up with
corporations, lobby the government, unrestricted spending
by coprs on political ads. It's the government's fault, not
the corporations who own the government.


From: Carbon on
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:43:55 -0800, dene wrote:
> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4b7c5d2c$0$4850$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:58:20 -0800, dene wrote:
>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4b7b6ecb$0$4944$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:58:48 -0500, William Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>> I can certainly vouch for that. I went to emergency last summer.
>>>> There were a lot of underclass unemployed looking people in the
>>>> waiting room. I talked to the doctor for one (1) minute. No
>>>> treatment was performed. The cost: around $500.
>>>
>>> Underclass? I thought liberal dogma teaches that "we're all the
>>> same."
>>
>> If I can smell them from across the waiting room then they are
>> clearly different from me. If they want to lay around all day and be
>> losers, that's great. I don't care. But I shouldn't have to get stuck
>> paying for them. That is exactly what is happening in this broken
>> system. Don't you think it's wrong?
>
> Did I just get a whiff of personal responsibility in this diatribe?
> There's hope for you, Carbs!!! ;>

Obviously I believe in hard work and personal responsibility. Why would
anyone assume otherwise? Because I'm a liberal?

The biggest advantage to universal healthcare is that it's cheaper. It
doesn't make financial sense to have this huge insurance bureaucracy if
all the unemployed people can just go to emergency and stick the
insureds with all the bills. It's crazy.